dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributorUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributorUniv Barretos
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T15:21:43Z
dc.date.available2014-05-20T15:21:43Z
dc.date.created2014-05-20T15:21:43Z
dc.date.issued1999-02-01
dc.identifierEndodontics & Dental Traumatology. Copenhagen: Munksgaard Int Publ Ltd, v. 15, n. 1, p. 28-32, 1999.
dc.identifier0109-2502
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/32838
dc.identifier10.1111/j.1600-9657.1999.tb00745.x
dc.identifierWOS:000078278800005
dc.description.abstractThe objective of the present study was to evaluate two different types of root canal sealers: AH Plus (an epoxy resin-based sealer) and Fill Canal (a zinc oxide-eugenol based sealer). A total of 34 root canals with vital pulp from dogs' premolars were used. After instrumentation, the root canals were filled with gutta-percha and AH Plus or gutta-percha and Fill Canal sealers using a classical technique of lateral condensation. After histological processing, the sections were stained with hematoxylineosin or Mallory's trichrome stain. Inflammatory cells or areas of necrosis were not associated with AH Plus. Hard tissue formation apically to the material was observed in 14 specimens. The Fill Canal sealer presented an inflammatory response of moderate intensity in the periapical region, mainly adjacent to the material.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherMunksgaard Int Publ Ltd
dc.relationEndodontics & Dental Traumatology
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectbiocompatibility
dc.subjectroot canal sealer
dc.subjectroot canal treatment
dc.titleTissue response to an epoxy resin-based root canal sealer
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución