dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-30T18:31:26Z
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:44:55Z
dc.date.available2013-09-30T18:31:26Z
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:44:55Z
dc.date.created2013-09-30T18:31:26Z
dc.date.created2014-05-20T13:44:55Z
dc.date.issued2012-05-01
dc.identifierMicroscopy Research and Technique. Malden: Wiley-blackwell, v. 75, n. 5, p. 667-670, 2012.
dc.identifier1059-910X
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/15768
dc.identifier10.1002/jemt.21109
dc.identifierWOS:000302799700018
dc.identifier8672541377335694
dc.identifier0000-0003-2386-842X
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate the presence of porosities inside the glass ionomer cement (GIC) after different techniques of material insertion. MATERIAL and METHOD: Specimens were prepared with high-viscosity GIC Ketac Molar Easymix and divided into three groups according to the insertion method: spatula (PI), Centrix injector (CI), and low-cost syringe (LCS). The specimens were fractured and observed with scanning electronic microscopy to quantitatively evaluate porosity inside the material using Image J Software. RESULTS: Statistical analysis, ANOVA application, and Tukey test to significance level of 5%, revealed that there was no statistical difference between the groups. CONCLUSION: Although the use of LCS has not decreased the porosity of the material, this insertion method is easy, accessible, and low cost, which makes it a viable alternative of use in the ART technique and in others bucal health programs. Microsc. Res. Tech., 2012. (c) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell
dc.relationMicroscopy Research and Technique
dc.relation1.087
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectporosity
dc.subjectinsertion
dc.subjectglass ionomer cement
dc.titleInfluences of the insertion method in glass ionomer cement porosity
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución