Diagnóstico da otite média em cães: comparação entre radiografia convencional, canalografia e audiometria de impedância

dc.contributorUniversidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:39:22Z
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:39:22Z
dc.date.created2014-05-20T13:39:22Z
dc.date.issued2011-12-01
dc.identifierArquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Escola de Veterinária, v. 63, n. 6, p. 1599-1604, 2011.
dc.identifier0102-0935
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/13660
dc.identifier10.1590/S0102-09352011000600046
dc.identifierS0102-09352011000600046
dc.identifierWOS:000298342900046
dc.identifierS0102-09352011000600046.pdf
dc.identifier5085484980214125
dc.identifier0000-0003-1944-2426
dc.description.abstractRadiography (conventional and contrasted - canalography) and audioelectrophysiologic (impedance audiometry) tests were correlated with otitis media in 12 middle ear affected and 12 healthy dogs. When comparing both diagnostic methods, it was found that the reliability in the detection of otitis media in dogs was 100% for the first and 58.3-60.0% for the latter. Thus, it was possible to attest that the impedance audiometry was the most accurate method in the identification of otitis media in dogs when compared with radiographic assessments.
dc.languagepor
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Escola de Veterinária
dc.relationArquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia
dc.relation0.286
dc.relation0,248
dc.rightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceSciELO
dc.subjectdog
dc.subjectradiology
dc.subjectotoscopy
dc.subjectimpedance audiometry
dc.subjectotitis
dc.subjectear
dc.titleDiagnóstico da otite média em cães: comparação entre radiografia convencional, canalografia e audiometria de impedância
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución