Urethral reconstruction after total penectomy for urethral cancer

dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:38:45Z
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:38:45Z
dc.date.created2014-05-20T13:38:45Z
dc.date.issued2004-01-01
dc.identifierUrologia Internationalis. Basel: Karger, v. 72, n. 4, p. 281-283, 2004.
dc.identifier0042-1138
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/13435
dc.identifier10.1159/000077678
dc.identifierWOS:000221576000002
dc.identifier9361222663660631
dc.identifier8242022545865685
dc.identifier9989857854355692
dc.identifier0000-0001-8411-5822
dc.description.abstractA 59-year-old white man developed a ventral ulcer with irregular limits in the middle portion of the penis. The result of the pathologic analysis was compatible with invasive squamous cell urethral carcinoma. A total penectomy was performed. In these cases, the usually recommended urinary diversion is perineal urethrostomy. However, due to the specifications of the case, perineal urethrostomy could not be performed. The literature did not offer any other alternative for patients with this same condition. Therefore, a urethral reconstruction using a groin skin flap had to be performed. Copyright (C) 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherKarger
dc.relationUrologia Internationalis
dc.relation1.508
dc.relation0,672
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjecturethral cancer
dc.subjecturethral stricture
dc.subjecttubular groin skin flap
dc.subjectpenile carcinoma, treatment
dc.subjectperineal urethrostomy
dc.titleUrethral reconstruction after total penectomy for urethral cancer
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución