dc.contributor | Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) | |
dc.contributor | Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM) | |
dc.contributor | UFV Departamento de Estatística | |
dc.contributor | University of Wisconsin Department of Dairy Science | |
dc.contributor | Universidade de São Paulo (USP) | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-05-20T13:18:13Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-05-20T13:18:13Z | |
dc.date.created | 2014-05-20T13:18:13Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012-01-01 | |
dc.identifier | Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 41, n. 1, p. 52-57, 2012. | |
dc.identifier | 1516-3598 | |
dc.identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/4391 | |
dc.identifier | 10.1590/S1516-35982012000100008 | |
dc.identifier | S1516-35982012000100008 | |
dc.identifier | WOS:000300431700008 | |
dc.identifier | S1516-35982012000100008.pdf | |
dc.description.abstract | The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of probit and logit link functions for the genetic evaluation of early pregnancy using simulated data. The following simulation/analysis structures were constructed: logit/logit, logit/probit, probit/logit, and probit/probit. The percentages of precocious females were 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30% and were adjusted based on a change in the mean of the latent variable. The parametric heritability (h²) was 0.40. Simulation and genetic evaluation were implemented in the R software. Heritability estimates (ĥ²) were compared with h² using the mean squared error. Pearson correlations between predicted and true breeding values and the percentage of coincidence between true and predicted ranking, considering the 10% of bulls with the highest breeding values (TOP10) were calculated. The mean ĥ² values were under- and overestimated for all percentages of precocious females when logit/probit and probit/logit models used. In addition, the mean squared errors of these models were high when compared with those obtained with the probit/probit and logit/logit models. Considering ĥ², probit/probit and logit/logit were also superior to logit/probit and probit/logit, providing values close to the parametric heritability. Logit/probit and probit/logit presented low Pearson correlations, whereas the correlations obtained with probit/probit and logit/logit ranged from moderate to high. With respect to the TOP10 bulls, logit/probit and probit/logit presented much lower percentages than probit/probit and logit/logit. The genetic parameter estimates and predictions of breeding values of the animals obtained with the logit/logit and probit/probit models were similar. In contrast, the results obtained with probit/logit and logit/probit were not satisfactory. There is need to compare the estimation and prediction ability of logit and probit link functions. | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.publisher | Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia | |
dc.relation | Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia | |
dc.relation | 0,337 | |
dc.rights | Acesso aberto | |
dc.source | SciELO | |
dc.subject | beef cattle | |
dc.subject | early pregnancy | |
dc.subject | genetic parameters | |
dc.subject | GLMM | |
dc.subject | link function | |
dc.title | Generalized linear mixed models for the genetic evaluation of binary reproductive traits: a simulation study | |
dc.type | Artículos de revistas | |