Costa Rica
| Artículos de revistas
A user interaction bug analyzer based on image processing
dc.creator | Méndez Porras, Abel | |
dc.creator | Alfaro Velásco, Jorge | |
dc.creator | Jenkins Coronas, Marcelo | |
dc.creator | Martínez Porras, Alexandra | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-01-18T16:09:47Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-04-25T15:15:20Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-01-18T16:09:47Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-04-25T15:15:20Z | |
dc.date.created | 2018-01-18T16:09:47Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016-08 | |
dc.identifier | http://www.clei.org/cleiej/paper.php?id=357 | |
dc.identifier | 0717- 5000 | |
dc.identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10669/73879 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/2381017 | |
dc.description.abstract | Mobile applications support a set of user-interaction features that are independent of the application logic. Rotating the device, scrolling, or zooming are examples of such features. Some bugs in mobile applications can be attributed to user-interaction features. Objective: This paper proposes and evaluates a bug analyzer based on userinteraction features that uses digital image processing to find bugs. Method: Our bug analyzer detects bugs by comparing the similarity between images taken before and after a user-interaction. SURF, an interest point detector and descriptor, is used to compare the images. To evaluate the bug analyzer, we conducted a case study with 15 randomly selected mobile applications. First, we identified user-interaction bugs by manually testing the applications. Images were captured before and after applying each user-interaction feature. Then, image pairs were processed with SURF to obtain interest points, from which a similarity percentage was computed, to finally decide whether there was a bug. Results: We performed a total of 49 user-interaction feature tests. When manually testing the applications, 17 bugs were found, whereas when using image processing, 15 bugs were detected. Conclusions: 8 out of 15 mobile applications tested had bugs associated to user-interaction features. Our bug analyzer based on image processing was able to detect 88% (15 out of 17) of the user-interaction bugs found with manual testing. | |
dc.language | en_US | |
dc.source | CLEI Electronic Journal, Volume 19, Número 2. 2016 | |
dc.subject | Bug analyzer, | |
dc.subject | User-interaction features | |
dc.subject | Image processing | |
dc.subject | Interest points | |
dc.subject | Testing | |
dc.title | A user interaction bug analyzer based on image processing | |
dc.type | Artículos de revistas | |
dc.type | Artículo científico |