dc.creatorMorales Delgado, Jorge A.
dc.creatorMolina Delgado, Mauricio
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-15T16:34:07Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-25T14:46:22Z
dc.date.available2019-01-15T16:34:07Z
dc.date.available2019-04-25T14:46:22Z
dc.date.created2019-01-15T16:34:07Z
dc.date.issued2017-03-27
dc.identifierhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/11663081.2017.1307657?journalCode=tncl20
dc.identifier1958-5780
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10669/76393
dc.identifier10.1080/11663081.2017.1307657
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/2374422
dc.description.abstractThe present paper analyses the topic of scientific discovery and the problem of the existence of a logical framework involved in such endeavour. We inquire how several non-monotonic logic frameworks and other formalisms can account for such a task. In the same vein, we analyse some key aspects of the historical and theoretical debate surrounding scientific discovery, in particular, the context of discovery and context of justification context distinction. We present an argument concerning the weakening of the discovery/justification context dichotomy based on the descriptive accent contained in the non-monotonic logic perspective together with its epistemological concerns.
dc.languageen_US
dc.sourceJournal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, vol.26(4), pp. 315-335.
dc.subjectScientific models
dc.subjectScientific discovery
dc.subjectCognitive science
dc.subjectNon-monotonic logic
dc.subjectDefeasible logic
dc.titleThe discovery/justification context dichotomy within formal and computational models of scientific theories: a weakening of the distinction based on the perspective of non-monotonic logics
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución