dc.date.accessioned2012-05-04T12:24:03Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-10T21:24:22Z
dc.date.available2012-05-04T12:24:03Z
dc.date.available2019-04-10T21:24:22Z
dc.date.created2012-05-04T12:24:03Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier0003-3219
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10923/941
dc.identifier10.2319/052510-348.1
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/2325840
dc.description.abstractObjective: To measure space closure during the retraction of upper permanent canines with selfligating and conventional brackets. Materials and Methods: Fifteen patients who required maxillary canine retraction into first premolar extraction sites as part of their orthodontic treatment completed this study. In a random split-mouth design, the retraction of upper canines was performed using an elastomeric chain with 150 g of force. The evaluations were performed in dental casts (T0, initial; T1, 4 weeks; T2, 8 weeks; T3, 12 weeks). The amount of movement and the rotation of the canines as well as anchorage loss of the upper first molars were evaluated. Results: There was no difference between self-ligating and conventional brackets regarding the distal movement of upper canines and mesial movement of first molars (P .05). Rotation of the upper canines was minimized with self-ligating brackets (P, .05). Conclusion: Distal movement of the upper canines and anchorage loss of the first molars were similar with both conventional and self-ligating brackets. Rotation of the upper canines during sliding mechanics was minimized with self-ligating brackets.
dc.languageen_US
dc.publisherAngle Society of Orthodontia
dc.publisherPorto Alegre
dc.subjectSELF-LIGATING BRACKETES
dc.subjectCANINE RETRACTION
dc.subjectFRICTION
dc.subjectODONTOLOGIA
dc.subjectRETRAÇÃO (ODONTOLOGIA)
dc.titleMaxillary canine retraction with self-ligating and conventional brackets
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución