ON THE EFFECTS OF TECHNOLOGY SHOCKS OVER LABOR INPUT AT BUSINESS-CYCLE FREQUENCIES: AN EMPIRICAL NOTE

dc.contributorSasakawa Young Leader Foundation Fellowship (SYLFF)en-US
dc.contributorpt-BR
dc.creatorMagalhães, Matheus Albergaria de
dc.creatorPicchetti, Paulo
dc.date2013-09-06
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-07T19:14:22Z
dc.date.available2018-11-07T19:14:22Z
dc.identifierhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/AnaliseEconomica/article/view/21385
dc.identifier10.22456/2176-5456.21385
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/2176671
dc.descriptionIn the last years, there has been a heated debate over the empirical adequacy of Real-Business-Cycle (RBC) models (GALÍ, 1999; CHRISTIANO; EICHENBAUM; VIGFUSSON, 2003; FRANCIS; RAMEY, 2005). In this empirical note, we check the robustness of some of the main results obtained in this strand of the literature. Our contribution is twofold: first, we provide robust results by using different data sources; second, we show that the results related to labor input’s dynamic pattern over business-cycle horizons are sensitive to the way labor input is modelled. The results obtained favor specifications where labor input is modelled as growth rates. These results may help distinguishing the most desirable empirical specifications to be employed over the debate in the future.en-US
dc.descriptionIn the last years, there has been a heated debate over the empirical adequacy of Real-Business-Cycle (RBC) models (GALÍ, 1999; CHRISTIANO; EICHENBAUM; VIGFUSSON, 2003; FRANCIS; RAMEY, 2005). In this empirical note, we check the robustness of some of the main results obtained in this strand of the literature. Our contribution is twofold: first, we provide robust results by using different data sources; second, we show that the results related to labor input’s dynamic pattern over business-cycle horizons are sensitive to the way labor input is modelled. The results obtained favor specifications where labor input is modelled as growth rates. These results may help distinguishing the most desirable empirical specifications to be employed over the debate in the future.pt-BR
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUFRGSpt-BR
dc.relationhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/AnaliseEconomica/article/view/21385/26852
dc.sourceAnálise Econômica; v. 31, n. 60 (2013): setembro de 2013en-US
dc.sourceAnálise Econômica; v. 31, n. 60 (2013): setembro de 2013pt-BR
dc.source2176-5456
dc.source0102-9924
dc.subjectEconomiaen-US
dc.subjectTechnology shocks; Business cycles; RBC modelsen-US
dc.subjectE32; C32; C52en-US
dc.subjectpt-BR
dc.subjectTechnology shocks; Business cycles; RBC modelspt-BR
dc.subjectE32; C32; C52pt-BR
dc.titleON THE EFFECTS OF TECHNOLOGY SHOCKS OVER LABOR INPUT AT BUSINESS-CYCLE FREQUENCIES: AN EMPIRICAL NOTEen-US
dc.titleON THE EFFECTS OF TECHNOLOGY SHOCKS OVER LABOR INPUT AT BUSINESS-CYCLE FREQUENCIES: AN EMPIRICAL NOTEpt-BR
dc.typeArtículos de revistas
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución