dc.creatorYavich, Natalia
dc.creatorBáscolo, Ernesto Pablo
dc.creatorHaggerty, Jeannie
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-18T21:51:41Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-06T16:06:37Z
dc.date.available2018-07-18T21:51:41Z
dc.date.available2018-11-06T16:06:37Z
dc.date.created2018-07-18T21:51:41Z
dc.date.issued2016-06
dc.identifierYavich, Natalia; Báscolo, Ernesto Pablo; Haggerty, Jeannie; Comparing the performance of the public, social security and private health subsystems in Argentina by core dimensions of primary health care; Oxford University Press; Family Practice; 33; 3; 6-2016; 249-260
dc.identifier0263-2136
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/52632
dc.identifier1460-2229
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1904718
dc.description.abstractBackground: Most Latin American health systems are comprised of public (PubS), social security (SSS) and private (PrS) subsystems. These subsystems coexist, causing health care fragmentation and population segmentation. Objective: To estimate the extent of subsystem cross-coverage in a geographically bounded population (Rosario city) and to compare the subsystems' performance on primary health care (PHC) dimensions. Methods: Through a cross-sectional, interviewer-administered survey to a representative sample (n = 822) of the Rosario population, we measured the percentage of cross-coverage (people with usual source of care in one subsystem but also covered by another subsystem) and the health services' performance by core PHC dimensions, as reported by each subsystem's usual users. We compared the subsystems' performance using chi-square analysis and one-way analysis of variance testing. We analyzed whether the observed differences were coherent with the predominant institutional and organizational features of each subsystem. Results: Overall, 39.3% of the population was affiliated with the PubS, 44.8% with the SSS and 15.9% with the PrS. Cross-coverage was reported by 40.6% of respondents. The performance of the PubS was weak on accessibility but strong on person-and-community-oriented care, the opposite of the PrS. The SSS combined the strengths of the other two subsystems. Conclusion: Rosario's health system has a high percentage of cross-coverage, contributing to issues of fragmentation, segmentation, financial inequity and inefficiency. The overall performance of the SSS was better than that of the PrS and PubS, though each subsystem had a particular performance pattern with areas of strength and weakness that were consistent with their institutional and organizational profiles.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://academic.oup.com/fampra/article/33/3/249/1750001
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmw043
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectACCESS
dc.subjectAND EVALUATION
dc.subjectHEALTH CARE QUALITY
dc.subjectHEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
dc.subjectINTEGRATED HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS
dc.subjectLATIN AMERICA
dc.subjectPRIMARY HEALTH CARE
dc.subjectPUBLIC HEALTH
dc.titleComparing the performance of the public, social security and private health subsystems in Argentina by core dimensions of primary health care
dc.typeArtículos de revistas
dc.typeArtículos de revistas
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución