dc.creatorHoerth, Rebecca M.
dc.creatorKatunar, Maria Rosa
dc.creatorGomez Sanchez, Andrea Valeria
dc.creatorOrellano, Juan C.
dc.creatorCere, Silvia
dc.creatorWagermaier, Wolfgang
dc.creatorBallarre, Josefina
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-29T19:30:28Z
dc.date.available2016-03-29T19:30:28Z
dc.date.created2016-03-29T19:30:28Z
dc.date.issued2013-10-30
dc.identifierHoerth, Rebecca M.; Katunar, Maria Rosa; Gomez Sanchez, Andrea Valeria; Orellano, Juan C.; Cere, Silvia; et al.; A comparative study of zirconium and titanium implants in rat: Osseointegration and bone material quality; Springer; Journal Of Materials Science-materials In Medicine; 25; 2; 30-10-2013; 411-422
dc.identifier0957-4530
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/4958
dc.description.abstractPermanent metal implants are widely used in human medical treatments and orthopedics, for example as hip joint replacements. They are commonly made of titanium alloys and beyond the optimization of this established material, it is also essential to explore alternative implant materials in view of improved osseointegration. The aim of our study was to characterize the implant performance of zirconium in comparison to titanium implants. Zirconium implants have been characterized in a previous study concerning material properties and surface characteristics in vitro, such as oxide layer thickness and surface roughness. In the present study, we compare bone material quality around zirconium and titanium implants in terms of osseointegration and therefore characterized bone material properties in a rat model using a multi-method approach. We used light and electron microscopy, micro Raman spectroscopy, micro X-ray fluorescence and X-ray scattering techniques to investigate the osseointegration in terms of compositional and structural properties of the newly formed bone. Regarding the mineralization level, the mineral composition, and the alignment and order of the mineral particles, our results show that the maturity of the newly formed bone after 8 weeks of implantation is already very high. In conclusion, the bone material quality obtained for zirconium implants is at least as good as for titanium. It seems that the zirconium implants can be a good candidate for using as permanent metal prosthesis for orthopedic treatments
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/0957-4530
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10856-013-5074-3
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10856-013-5074-3
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/24170339
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectAnodization
dc.subjectOsseointegration
dc.subjectZirconium
dc.subjectSaxs
dc.titleA comparative study of zirconium and titanium implants in rat: Osseointegration and bone material quality
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución