dc.creatorBalbarani, Sebastian
dc.creatorEuillades, Pablo Andrés
dc.creatorEuillades, Leonardo Daniel
dc.creatorCasullo, F.
dc.creatorRiveros, Natalia Cecilia
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-02T13:53:10Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-06T15:30:58Z
dc.date.available2015-11-02T13:53:10Z
dc.date.available2018-11-06T15:30:58Z
dc.date.created2015-11-02T13:53:10Z
dc.date.issued2013-09-04
dc.identifierBalbarani, Sebastian; Euillades, Pablo Andrés; Euillades, Leonardo Daniel; Casu, Francesco; Riveros, Natalia Cecilia; Atmospheric corrections in interferometric synthetic aperture radar surface deformation - a case study of the city of Mendoza, Argentina; Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union (EGU); Advances in Geosciences; 35; 4-9-2013; 105-113
dc.identifier1680-7340
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/2606
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1898009
dc.description.abstractDifferential interferometry is a remote sensing technique that allows studying crustal deformation produced by several phenomena like earthquakes, landslides, land subsidence and volcanic eruptions. Advanced techniques, like small baseline subsets (SBAS), exploit series of images acquired by synthetic aperture radar (SAR) sensors during a given time span. Phase propagation delay in the atmosphere is the main systematic error of interferometric SAR measurements. It affects differently images acquired at different days or even at different hours of the same day. So, datasets acquired during the same time span from different sensors (or sensor configuration) often give diverging results. Here we processed two datasets acquired from June 2010 to December 2011 by COSMO-SkyMed satellites. One of them is HH-polarized, and the other one is VV-polarized and acquired on different days. As expected, time series computed from these datasets show differences. We attributed them to non-compensated atmospheric artifacts and tried to correct them by using ERAInterim global atmospheric model (GAM) data. With this method, we were able to correct less than 50 % of the scenes, considering an area where no phase unwrapping errors were detected. We conclude that GAM-based corrections are not enough for explaining differences in computed time series, at least in the processed area of interest. We remark that no direct meteorological data for the GAM-based corrections were employed. Further research is needed in order to understand under what conditions this kind of data can be used.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherCopernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union (EGU)
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.5194/adgeo-35-105-2013
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://dx.doi.rog/10.5194/adgeo-35-105-2013
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.adv-geosci.net/35/105/2013/adgeo-35-105-2013.pdf
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 AR)
dc.subjectATMOSPHERE
dc.subjectDIFFERENTIAL INTERFEROMETRY
dc.subjectCORRECTIONS
dc.subjectGAM
dc.titleAtmospheric corrections in interferometric synthetic aperture radar surface deformation - a case study of the city of Mendoza, Argentina
dc.typeArtículos de revistas
dc.typeArtículos de revistas
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución