dc.creatorFolguera, Alicia
dc.creatorZárate, Marcelo Arístides
dc.creatorTedesco, Ana María
dc.creatorDavila, Federico Miguel
dc.creatorRamos, Victor Alberto
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-29T20:13:46Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-06T15:17:10Z
dc.date.available2017-06-29T20:13:46Z
dc.date.available2018-11-06T15:17:10Z
dc.date.created2017-06-29T20:13:46Z
dc.date.issued2015-12
dc.identifierFolguera, Alicia; Zárate, Marcelo Arístides; Tedesco, Ana María; Davila, Federico Miguel; Ramos, Victor Alberto; Evolution of the Neogene Andean foreland basins of the Southern Pampas and Northern Patagonia (34°–41°S), Argentina; Elsevier; Journal of South American Earth Sciences; 64; Part 2; 12-2015; 452-466
dc.identifier0895-9811
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/19205
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1895637
dc.description.abstractThe Pampas plain (30°–41°S) has historically been considered as a sector that evolved independently from the adjacent Andean ranges. Nevertheless, the study of the Pampas showed that it is reasonable to expect an important influence from the Andes into the extraandean area. The Pampas plain can be divided into two sectors: the northern portion, adjacent to the Pampean Ranges, has been studied by Davila (2005, 2007, 2010). The southern sector (34°–41°S) is the objective of the present work. The study of this area allowed to characterize two separate foreland basins: the Southern Pampa basin and the Northern Patagonian basin. The infill is composed of Late Miocene and Pliocene units, interpreted as distal synorogenic sequences associated with the late Cenozoic Andean uplift at this latitudinal range. These foreland basins have been defined based on facies changes, distinct depositional styles, along with the analysis of sedimentary and isopach maps. The basins geometries are proposed following De Celles and Gilles (1996) taking into account the infill geometry, distribution and grain size. In both cases, these depocenters are located remarkably far away from the Andean tectonics loads. Therefore they cannot be explained with short-wave subsidence patterns. Elastic models explain the tectonic subsidence in the proximal depocenters but fail to replicate the complete distal basins. These characteristics show that dynamic subsidence is controlling the subsidence in the Southern Pampas and Northern Patagonian basins.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2015.05.010
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895981115300067
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectBasin analysis
dc.subjectNeogene
dc.subjectDynamic topography
dc.subjectBroken Andean foreland
dc.subjectSouthern Pampa
dc.titleEvolution of the Neogene Andean foreland basins of the Southern Pampas and Northern Patagonia (34°–41°S), Argentina
dc.typeArtículos de revistas
dc.typeArtículos de revistas
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución