dc.creatorMontalvo, Claudia Inés
dc.creatorFernández, Fernando Julián
dc.creatorTallade, P. O.
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-03T16:47:10Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-06T14:44:32Z
dc.date.available2018-08-03T16:47:10Z
dc.date.available2018-11-06T14:44:32Z
dc.date.created2018-08-03T16:47:10Z
dc.date.issued2016-11
dc.identifierMontalvo, Claudia Inés; Fernández, Fernando Julián; Tallade, P. O.; The Role of Bubo virginianus magellanicus as Rodent Bone Accumulator in Archaeological Sites: A Case Study for the Atuel River (Mendoza, Argentina); John Wiley & Sons Ltd; International Journal of Osteoarchaeology; 26; 6; 11-2016; 974-986
dc.identifier1047-482X
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/54071
dc.identifier1099-1212
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1889735
dc.description.abstractMicromammalian bone assemblages from modern pellets of the strigiform Bubo virginianus magellanicus, from the upper Atuel River (southern Mendoza, Argentina), were taphonomically analysed. The results allow us to place B. v. magellanicus in the category of intermediate modification (Category 2). This sample has also been compared with results from other members of this genus, in order to classify B. v. magellanicus as a taphonomic agent. The participation of the Bubo species in archaeological accumulations has been documented, but in Argentina, the role of B. v. magellanicus has been reported up to the present. It is partly because of the sequence of one archaeological site in the south of Mendoza Province called Laguna El Sosneado-3 (LS-3). However, considering the absence of a current taphonomic model of this owl, this participation was mentioned as a hypothesis. In the current investigation, archaeological and modern samples have been compared. The results indicate that the skeletal element assemblages recovered from LS-3 were accumulated by strigiform birds. Taphonomical evidence of light modifications on units I and IV indicates that Tyto alba (Category 1) was probably the main species involved in these units, whereas the taphonomical evidence on skeletal element assemblages recovered from units II and III suggests the action of a strigiform with a major category of modification such as B. v. magellanicus.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons Ltd
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oa.2509
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/oa.2509
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORD
dc.subjectARGENTINA
dc.subjectBUBO VIRGINIANUS MAGELLANICUS
dc.subjectRODENTS
dc.subjectSOUTHERN MENDOZA
dc.subjectTAPHONOMY
dc.titleThe Role of Bubo virginianus magellanicus as Rodent Bone Accumulator in Archaeological Sites: A Case Study for the Atuel River (Mendoza, Argentina)
dc.typeArtículos de revistas
dc.typeArtículos de revistas
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución