dc.creatorImaizumi, Toshiyuki
dc.creatorAuge, Gabriela Alejandra
dc.creatorDonohue, Kathleen
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-21T20:14:03Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-06T14:42:18Z
dc.date.available2017-07-21T20:14:03Z
dc.date.available2018-11-06T14:42:18Z
dc.date.created2017-07-21T20:14:03Z
dc.date.issued2017-04
dc.identifierImaizumi, Toshiyuki; Auge, Gabriela Alejandra; Donohue, Kathleen; Photoperiod throughout the maternal life cycle, not photoperiod during seed imbibition, influences germination in Arabidopsis thaliana; Botanical Society of America; American Journal of Botany; 104; 4; 4-2017; 516-526
dc.identifier0002-9122
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/21129
dc.identifier1537-2197
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1889226
dc.description.abstractPREMISE OF THE STUDY: Plants adjust their phenology in response to seasonal cues experienced both by their parents and by themselves, and coordinating responses to these cues is necessary for expressing adaptive phenology. We investigated how cues are integrated across time to influence an important progeny phenotype, i.e., seed germination. METHODS: We used Arabidopsis thaliana to investigate how the photoperiod experienced by maternal parents and by progeny influences seed germination. We examined when maternal photoperiod effects on germination are imposed and how long they persist in progeny. KEY RESULTS: The photoperiod experienced by maternal plants more strongly influenced germination than the photoperiod experienced during seed imbibition. In addition, the photoperiod experienced at the prereproductive stage frequently influenced germination as strongly as that experienced during reproduction. In general, seeds from plants grown under short days had higher seed germination percentages than seeds from plants grown in longer days. These maternal effects diminished with after-ripening, but reappeared in seeds induced into secondary dormancy. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence that the effect of photoperiod systematically attenuates in proportion to the time that elapsed between the cue and the timing of seed germination. Moreover, more recently experienced cues did not override the effects of cues experienced previously. Instead, specific sequences of photoperiods experienced at the prereproductive and reproductive stages appear to influence germination behavior.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherBotanical Society of America
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.amjbot.org/content/104/4/516
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1600389
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectARABIDOPSIS THALIANA
dc.subjectDORMANCY
dc.subjectGERMINATION
dc.subjectMATERNAL EFFECT
dc.subjectPHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY
dc.subjectPHOTOPERIOD
dc.subjectSEASONAL CUES
dc.subjectSECONDARY DORMANCY
dc.titlePhotoperiod throughout the maternal life cycle, not photoperiod during seed imbibition, influences germination in Arabidopsis thaliana
dc.typeArtículos de revistas
dc.typeArtículos de revistas
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución