dc.creatorDoughty, Christopher E.
dc.creatorSantos-Andrade, P. E.
dc.creatorGoldsmith, G. R.
dc.creatorBlonder, B.
dc.creatorShenkin, A.
dc.creatorBentley. L. P.
dc.creatorChavana-Bryant, C.
dc.creatorHuaraca-Huasco, W.
dc.creatorDíaz, Sandra Myrna
dc.creatorSalinas, N.
dc.creatorEnquist, B. J.
dc.creatorMartin, R.
dc.creatorAsner, G. P.
dc.creatorMalh, Y.
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-23T14:48:48Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-06T14:38:41Z
dc.date.available2018-05-23T14:48:48Z
dc.date.available2018-11-06T14:38:41Z
dc.date.created2018-05-23T14:48:48Z
dc.date.issued2017-11
dc.identifierDoughty, Christopher E.; Santos-Andrade, P. E.; Goldsmith, G. R.; Blonder, B.; Shenkin, A.; et al.; Can leaf spectroscopy predict leaf and forest traits along a peruvian tropical forest elevation gradient?; Agu Publications; Journal of Geophysical Research; 122; 11; 11-2017; 2952-2965
dc.identifier2169-8953
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/45989
dc.identifier2169-8961
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1888547
dc.description.abstractHigh‐resolution spectroscopy can be used to measure leaf chemical and structural traits. Such leaf traits are often highly correlated to other traits, such as photosynthesis, through the leaf economics spectrum. We measured VNIR (visible‐near infrared) leaf reflectance (400–1,075 nm) of sunlit and shaded leaves in ~150 dominant species across ten, 1 ha plots along a 3,300 m elevation gradient in Peru (on 4,284 individual leaves). We used partial least squares (PLS) regression to compare leaf reflectance to chemical traits, such as nitrogen and phosphorus, structural traits, including leaf mass per area (LMA), branch wood density and leaf venation, and “higher‐level” traits such as leaf photosynthetic capacity, leaf water repellency, and woody growth rates. Empirical models using leaf reflectance predicted leaf N and LMA (r2 > 30% and %RMSE < 30%), weakly predicted leaf venation, photosynthesis, and branch density (r2 between 10 and 35% and %RMSE between 10% and 65%), and did not predict leaf water repellency or woody growth rates (r2<5%). Prediction of higher‐level traits such as photosynthesis and branch density is likely due to these traits correlations with LMA, a trait readily predicted with leaf spectroscopy.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherAgu Publications
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://bit.ly/2Lo5i5n
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2017JG003883
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectLEAF REFLECTANCE
dc.subjectLEAF PROPERTIES
dc.subjectHIGH-RESOLUTION SPECTROSCOPY
dc.titleCan leaf spectroscopy predict leaf and forest traits along a peruvian tropical forest elevation gradient?
dc.typeArtículos de revistas
dc.typeArtículos de revistas
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución