Artículos de revistas
Endolithic invertebrate communities and bioerosion rates in southwestern Atlantic intertidal consolidated sediments
Fecha
2014-08Registro en:
Bagur Creta, Maria; Gutierrez, Jorge Luis Ceferino; Arribas, Lorena Pilar; Palomo, Maria Gabriela; Endolithic invertebrate communities and bioerosion rates in southwestern Atlantic intertidal consolidated sediments; Springer; Marine Biology; 161; 10; 8-2014; 2279-2292
0025-3162
CONICET Digital
CONICET
Autor
Bagur Creta, Maria
Gutierrez, Jorge Luis Ceferino
Arribas, Lorena Pilar
Palomo, Maria Gabriela
Resumen
Organisms boring into intertidal consolidated sediments generate bioerosion. It is generally unknown, however, whether they can significantly contribute to coastline retraction. In this paper, we describe endolithic communities and estimate bioerosion and physical erosion rates at three southwestern Atlantic intertidal sites (37, 38, and 42°S; Argentina). In the northernmost site, we have also analyzed spatial variation in species richness and abundance as a function of height within the tidal slope, orientation of the rock surface in relation to breaking waves (i.e., facing or not), and rock hardness. The number of species and the combined abundance of individuals from the different species were larger at the low intertidal level but did not differ between surface orientations. The density of chemically boring organisms increased with increasing rock hardness and calcium carbonate content. In contrast, no correlation was found between rock hardness and the abundance of organisms that bore by mechanical means. Endolithic community composition and bioerosion rates differed among the three sites, the latter being higher at the site with the softer substrate. Bioerosion estimates were two orders of magnitude lower than physical erosion estimates at each site. The bivalve Lithophaga patagonica was the species that contributed the most to bioerosion at all these locations. While results suggest that bioerosion contributes little to overall coastal erosion at the three study sites, boring organisms might still facilitate physical erosion by weakening the rock either via chemical or mechanical means. Besides, their apparently inconsequential direct action as bioeroders can have positive consequences for biodiversity via increased habitat complexity.