dc.creatorde San Celedonio, Romina Paola
dc.creatorAbeledo, Leonor Gabriela
dc.creatorMantese, Anita Ida
dc.creatorMiralles, Daniel Julio
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-04T18:53:58Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-06T14:29:43Z
dc.date.available2018-07-04T18:53:58Z
dc.date.available2018-11-06T14:29:43Z
dc.date.created2018-07-04T18:53:58Z
dc.date.issued2017-08
dc.identifierde San Celedonio, Romina Paola; Abeledo, Leonor Gabriela; Mantese, Anita Ida; Miralles, Daniel Julio; Differential root and shoot biomass recovery in wheat and barley with transient waterlogging during preflowering; Springer; Plant and Soil; 417; 1-2; 8-2017; 481-498
dc.identifier0032-079X
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/51234
dc.identifier1573-5036
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1887048
dc.description.abstractAims: Wheat and barley plants exposed to waterlogging reduced their growth, but the final impact on grain yield depends on the capacity of the plant to recover after stress. The aim of this study was to evaluate shoot and root biomass accumulation in wheat and barley plants during waterlogging events applied at different stages during preflowering and after stress removal. Methods: Wheat and barley plants were waterlogged for 15–20 days at four consecutive periods during phenological cycle from emergence to flowering. Results: Waterlogging produced a delayed effect on shoot biomass, as biomass reductions were detected 20 days after waterlogging was released. The highest relative reductions of shoot biomass (60% in wheat and 68–74% in barley regarding control) occurred when waterlogging was applied early in the cycle (from emergence to tillering). Waterlogged plants showed a remarkable capacity to recover from early waterlogging (reaching similar shoot biomass as control plants at flowering), but recovery capacity decreased when waterlogging occurred later in the phenological cycle. For both species green leaf area and photosynthetic rate were reduced and water soluble carbohydrates increased when waterlogging ended, however the general trend showed values at flowering similar to the control plants. The impact of waterlogging on roots was generally higher than the one on shoots and the effect was detected immediately after treatment. The root system capacity to recover after waterlogging was lower than the one for shoots, and was higher in barley than in wheat. Conclusions: Waterlogging first damaged root biomass while effects on shoots were delayed. Shoot recovery at flowering was possible for waterlogging events previous to stem elongation, but root recovery was lower, especially for wheat.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11104-017-3274-1
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3274-1
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectAERENCHYMA FORMATION
dc.subjectPHOTOSYNTHESIS
dc.subjectRECOVERY
dc.subjectROOT BIOMASS
dc.subjectROOT LENGTH
dc.subjectSHOOT BIOMASS
dc.subjectWATER-SOLUBLE CARBOHYDRATES
dc.titleDifferential root and shoot biomass recovery in wheat and barley with transient waterlogging during preflowering
dc.typeArtículos de revistas
dc.typeArtículos de revistas
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución