dc.creatorFesta, Sabrina
dc.creatorCoppotelli, Bibiana Marina
dc.creatorMorelli, Irma Susana
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-19T18:42:37Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-06T14:20:54Z
dc.date.available2018-06-19T18:42:37Z
dc.date.available2018-11-06T14:20:54Z
dc.date.created2018-06-19T18:42:37Z
dc.date.issued2016-02
dc.identifierFesta, Sabrina; Coppotelli, Bibiana Marina; Morelli, Irma Susana; Comparative bioaugmentation with a consortium and a single strain in a phenanthrene-contaminated soil: Impact on the bacterial community and biodegradation ; Elsevier Science; Applied Soil Ecology; 98; 2-2016; 8-19
dc.identifier0929-1393
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/49379
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1885448
dc.description.abstractThe efficiency of two inoculation strategies, using a consortium (CON) or an isolated strain (AM), on phenanthrene-contaminated soil was determined with special concern on the study of the bacterial community composition by PCR-DGGE and pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA gene fragments. Both strategies stimulated the phenanthrene degradation, increasing the cultivable heterotrophic bacteria number and biological activity. At the end of the treatments, the microcosms inoculated with AM reached the lowest values of phenanthrene but also the lowest dehydrogenase activity. In DGGE patterns a reduction in number of bands in the contaminated and inoculated microcosms was observed, being the most significant differences attributed to inoculation with AM. The pyrosequencing technique yielded results that correlated with the fingerprint, showing that the bacterial community composition based on relative abundance was significantly modified by treatments. Sphingomonadales and Burkholderiales were highly stimulated by phenanthrene contamination and inoculation. In the Phe microcosm, the higher increase in Actinomycetales (mainly Arthrobacter) was observed. Effectively, the use of the strain AM as inoculant became the best strategy to remediate the soil mainly based on the degradation efficiency, however it caused more drastic changes in microbial community than inoculation with CON, what can be compromising the ulterior functionality of the soil.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevier Science
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.08.025
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929139315300780
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectBACTERIAL CONSORTIUM
dc.subjectBIOAUGMENTATION
dc.subjectCOMMUNITY COMPOSITION
dc.subjectPHENANTHRENE DEGRADATION
dc.subjectPYROSEQUENCING
dc.titleComparative bioaugmentation with a consortium and a single strain in a phenanthrene-contaminated soil: Impact on the bacterial community and biodegradation
dc.typeArtículos de revistas
dc.typeArtículos de revistas
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución