dc.creatorPrieto, L.
dc.creatorAlves, Cíntia
dc.creatorZimmermann, B.
dc.creatorTagliabracci, A.
dc.creatorPrieto, V.
dc.creatorMontesino, M.
dc.creatorWhitte, M. R.
dc.creatorAnjos, M. J.
dc.creatorCardoso, S.
dc.creatorHeinrichs, B.
dc.creatorHernandez, A.
dc.creatorLopez Parra, A. M.
dc.creatorSala, Adriana Andrea
dc.creatorSaragoni, V. G.
dc.creatorBurgos G.
dc.creatorMarino, Miguel Eduardo
dc.creatorParedes, M.
dc.creatorMora Torres, C. A.
dc.creatorAngulo, R.
dc.creatorChemale, G.
dc.creatorVullo, Carlos
dc.creatorSánchez Simón, M.
dc.creatorComas, D.
dc.creatorPuente, J.
dc.creatorLópez Cubría, C. M.
dc.creatorModesti, Nidia Maria
dc.creatorAler, M.
dc.creatorMerigioli, S.
dc.creatorBetancor, E.
dc.creatorPedrosa, D.
dc.creatorPlaza, G.
dc.creatorMasciovecchio, M. V.
dc.creatorSchneider, P. M.
dc.creatorParson, Walther
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-18T15:54:34Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-06T14:03:39Z
dc.date.available2017-10-18T15:54:34Z
dc.date.available2018-11-06T14:03:39Z
dc.date.created2017-10-18T15:54:34Z
dc.date.issued2013-04
dc.identifierPrieto, L.; Alves, Cíntia; Zimmermann, B.; Tagliabracci, A.; Prieto, V.; et al.; GHEP-ISFG proficiency test 2011: Paper challenge on evaluation of mitochondrial DNA results; Elsevier Ireland; Forensic Science International: Genetics; 7; 1; 4-2013; 10-15
dc.identifier1872-4973
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/26769
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1882399
dc.description.abstractThe GHEP-ISFG Working Group performed a collaborative exercise to monitor the current practice of mitochondrial (mt)DNA reporting. The participating laboratories were invited to evaluate a hypothetical case example and assess the statistical significance of a match between the haplotypes of a case (hair) sample and a suspect. A total of 31 forensic laboratories participated of which all but one used the EMPOP database. Nevertheless, we observed a tenfold range of reported LR values (32–333.4), which was mainly due to the selection of different reference datasets in EMPOP but also due to different applied formulae. The results suggest the need for more standardization as well as additional research to harmonize the reporting of mtDNA evidence.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevier Ireland
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2012.04.006
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1872497312000890
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectmt DNA interpretation
dc.subjectGHEP-ISFG
dc.subjectEMPOP
dc.subjectLR
dc.subjectDATABASE
dc.titleGHEP-ISFG proficiency test 2011: Paper challenge on evaluation of mitochondrial DNA results
dc.typeArtículos de revistas
dc.typeArtículos de revistas
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución