dc.creatorGomez Otero, Julieta
dc.creatorSchuster, Veronica
dc.creatorSvoboda, Ariadna
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-23T18:44:05Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-06T13:57:50Z
dc.date.available2017-10-23T18:44:05Z
dc.date.available2018-11-06T13:57:50Z
dc.date.created2017-10-23T18:44:05Z
dc.date.issued2014-12-29
dc.identifierGomez Otero, Julieta; Schuster, Veronica; Svoboda, Ariadna; Fish and plants: The “hidden” resources in the archaeological record of the North-central Patagonian coast (Argentina); Elsevier; Quaternary International; 373; 29-12-2014; 72-81
dc.identifier1040-6182
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/26923
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1881172
dc.description.abstractArchaeological research conducted from 1990 on the North-central Patagonian coast showed certain discrepancies between the archaeofaunal and the human stable isotopic record. In general, zooarchaeological studies indicated that most faunal remains consisted of guanacos and mollusks, followed by pinnipeds, and small mammals, birds, and fish in very low proportions. Unexpectedly, stable isotopes (13C and 15N) from human skeletal samples indicated that all individuals' diet included not only sea resources of high trophic level in variable proportions, but also terrestrial plants. Therefore, the need arose to investigate these differences, especially in regards to the less documented resources in the archaeological record: fish and plants. In this paper, we present the results of diverse methodological approaches used to inquire into the role these resources would have played among the native populations of the area through time. The methods include archaeofaunal and isotope analyses, gas chromatography in ceramic sherds, oral health in human samples, a distributional record of fishing and plant processing technology, and actualistic studies that explore the impact of post-depositional processes on the fish record. The results indicate that these resources were more important in the subsistence of the native populations of the study area than what was estimated a decade ago. However, plants seem to have been exploited in a higher systematic manner than fish due to the fact its presence was determined in most samples analyzed with stable isotopes and gas chromatography. For its part, fish remains were found only in some zooarchaeological assemblages and in fifty percent of the organic residues in pottery samples. The integrity of the ichthyoarchaeological record may have been altered by post-depositional processes and as well by cultural practices such as milling and processing in ceramic containers.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2014.12.013
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040618214009641
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectARCHAEOLOGY
dc.subjectPATAGONIAN COAST
dc.subjectFISH
dc.subjectPLANTS
dc.titleFish and plants: The “hidden” resources in the archaeological record of the North-central Patagonian coast (Argentina)
dc.typeArtículos de revistas
dc.typeArtículos de revistas
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución