dc.creatorNicholas, Andrew P.
dc.creatorSambrook Smith, Gregory H.
dc.creatorAmsler, Mario Luis
dc.creatorAshworth, Philip J.
dc.creatorBest, James L.
dc.creatorHardy, Richard J.
dc.creatorLane, Stuart N.
dc.creatorOrfeo, Oscar
dc.creatorParsons, Daniel R.
dc.creatorReesink, Arnold J.
dc.creatorSandbach, Stevend D.
dc.creatorSimpson, Christopher J.
dc.creatorSzupiany, Ricardo Nicolas
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-16T15:49:27Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-06T13:52:33Z
dc.date.available2017-11-16T15:49:27Z
dc.date.available2018-11-06T13:52:33Z
dc.date.created2017-11-16T15:49:27Z
dc.date.issued2015-11
dc.identifierNicholas, Andrew P.; Sambrook Smith, Gregory H.; Amsler, Mario Luis; Ashworth, Philip J.; Best, James L.; et al.; The role of discharge variability in determining alluvial stratigraphy; Geological Society of America; Geology; 44; 1; 11-2015; 3-6
dc.identifier0091-7613
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/28326
dc.identifier0091-7613
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1880369
dc.description.abstractWe illustrate the potential for using physics-based modeling to link alluvial stratigraphy to large river morphology and dynamics. Model simulations, validated using Ground Penetrating Radar data from the Río Paraná, Argentina, demonstrate a strong 30 relationship between bar-scale set thickness and channel depth, which applies across a wide range of river patterns and bar types. We show that hydrologic regime, indexed by discharge variability and flood duration, exerts a first-order influence on morphodynamics and hence bar set thickness, and that planform morphology alone may be a misleading variable for interpreting deposits. Indeed, our results illustrate that rivers evolving under contrasting hydrologic regimes may have very similar morphology, yet be characterized by marked differences in stratigraphy. This realization represents an important limitation on the application of established theory that links river topography to alluvial deposits, and highlights the need to obtain field evidence of discharge variability when developing paleoenvironmental reconstructions. Model simulations demonstrate the potential for deriving such evidence using metrics of paleocurrent variance.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherGeological Society of America
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1130/G37215.1
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geology/article/44/1/3-6/131973
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectALLUVIAL STRATIGRAPHY
dc.subjectDISCHARGE VARIABILITY
dc.subjectGPR
dc.subjectPARANA RIVER
dc.titleThe role of discharge variability in determining alluvial stratigraphy
dc.typeArtículos de revistas
dc.typeArtículos de revistas
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución