Pastoralism in the drylands of Latin America: Argentina, Chile, Mexico and Peru

dc.creatorGrünwaldt, Josefina María
dc.creatorCastellaro, G.
dc.creatorFlores, E. R.
dc.creatorMorales Nieto, C. R.
dc.creatorValdez Cepeda. R. D.
dc.creatorGuevara, Juan Carlos
dc.creatorGrunwaldt, Eduardo Guillermo
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-24T21:32:11Z
dc.date.available2018-08-24T21:32:11Z
dc.date.created2018-08-24T21:32:11Z
dc.date.issued2016-08
dc.identifierGrünwaldt, Josefina María; Castellaro, G.; Flores, E. R.; Morales Nieto, C. R.; Valdez Cepeda. R. D.; et al.; Pastoralismo en zonas áridas de Latinoamérica: Argentina, Chile, México y Perú; Office Int Epizooties; Revue Scientifique Et Technique de L'office International Des Epizooties; 35; 2; 8-2016; 543-560
dc.identifier0253-1933
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/57110
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.description.abstractSummaryThis article discusses various aspects of pastoralism in the Latin Americancountries with the largest dryland areas. The topics covered include: social,economic and institutional issues; grasslands and their carrying capacity;production systems and productivity rates; competition for forage resourcesbetween domestic livestock and wildlife; and the health status of livestock andwildlife. Most grasslands exhibit some degree of degradation. The percentage ofoffspring reaching weaning age is low: 47-66% of calves and 40-80% of lambs.Some pastoralists adopt patterns of transhumance. In the main, pastoralistsexperience a high poverty rate and have poor access to social services. Formany pastoralists, wildlife is a source of food and by-products. Argentina, Chile,Mexico and Peru have animal health control agencies, are members of theWorld Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) and have signed the United NationsConvention to Combat Desertification. Pastoral systems subsist mainly on incomeunrelated to pastoral farming. The OIE recognises all four countries as free frominfection with peste des petits ruminants virus, and from rinderpest and Africanhorse sickness. It is difficult to predict the future of pastoralism in Latin Americabecause the situation differs from country to country. For instance, pastoralismis more important in Peru than in Argentina, where it is a more marginal activity.In the future, lack of promotion and protection policies could lead to a decline inpastoralism or to an adverse environmental impact on drylands.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherOffice Int Epizooties
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.20506/rst.35.2.2526
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://doc.oie.int/dyn/portal/index.xhtml?page=alo&aloId=33838
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectAnimal Health
dc.subjectDrylands
dc.subjectGrassland
dc.subjectPastoralism
dc.titlePastoralismo en zonas áridas de Latinoamérica: Argentina, Chile, México y Perú
dc.titlePastoralism in the drylands of Latin America: Argentina, Chile, Mexico and Peru
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución