dc.creatorLuquetti, Daniela
dc.creatorSaltzman, Babette S.
dc.creatorLópez Camelo, Jorge Santiago
dc.creatorDutra, Maria da Graça
dc.creatorCastilla, Eduardo Enrique
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-13T20:27:05Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-06T13:31:53Z
dc.date.available2017-10-13T20:27:05Z
dc.date.available2018-11-06T13:31:53Z
dc.date.created2017-10-13T20:27:05Z
dc.date.issued2013-11
dc.identifierLuquetti, Daniela; Saltzman, Babette S.; López Camelo, Jorge Santiago; Dutra, Maria da Graça; Castilla, Eduardo Enrique; Risk factors and demographics for microtia in South America: a case-control analysis; Wiley; Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology; 97; 11; 11-2013; 736-743
dc.identifier1542-0752
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/26651
dc.identifier1542-0760
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1876411
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The etiopathogenesis of microtia is still unknown in the majority of the cases, particularly for individuals presenting with isolated microtia. Our aim was to evaluate potential risk factors for this condition using a case–control approach. METHODS: We analyzed data from 1,194 live births with isolated microtia enrolled in the ECLAMC study (Estudio Colaborativo Latino Americano de Malformaciones Congénitas) from 1982 to 2011 and their respective controls. Odds ratios (ORs) were estimated with logistic regression models along with 95% confidence intervals for the resulting OR estimates controlling for the effects of potential confounders (sex, maternal age, hospital, and year of birth) for an adjusted OR (aOR). RESULTS: Multiparity was associated with a higher risk of microtia compared with primiparity (aOR, 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2–1.8), with women who had eight or more prior pregnancies having the highest risk (aOR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.6–5.2). Women who presented with cold-like symptoms were at higher risk for microtia (aOR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.2–3.9) as well as those that used tobacco or alcohol during pregnancy (aOR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1–2.6 and aOR, 1.4; 95% CI, 0.9–2.1, respectively). The association with alcohol use appeared to be limited to those women who reported binge drinking during pregnancy (aOR, 1.4; 95% CI, 0.7–3.1). Cases from hospitals at low altitude (<2500 m) tended to have more severe types of microtia than those from hospitals at high altitude. CONCLUSION: These results support the hypothesis that, in addition to teratogens, other nongenetic risk factors contribute to the occurrence of isolated microtia.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bdra.23193/abstract
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bdra.23193
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4098829/
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectRISK
dc.subjectFACTORS
dc.subjectDEMOGRAPHICS
dc.subjectANOTIA
dc.subjectEAR
dc.subjectEPIDEMIOLOGY
dc.subjectMICROTIA
dc.subjectNONGENETIC RISK FACTORS
dc.titleRisk factors and demographics for microtia in South America: a case-control analysis
dc.typeArtículos de revistas
dc.typeArtículos de revistas
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución