dc.creatorGoloboff, Pablo Augusto
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-03T19:46:44Z
dc.date.available2017-02-03T19:46:44Z
dc.date.created2017-02-03T19:46:44Z
dc.date.issued2015-04
dc.identifierGoloboff, Pablo Augusto; Computer science and parsimony: a reappraisal, with discussion of methods for poorly structured datasets; Wiley; Cladistics; 31; 2; 4-2015; 210-225
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/12477
dc.identifier1096-0031
dc.description.abstractIn recent years, several publications in computer science journals have proposed new heuristic methods for parsimony analysis. This contribution discusses those papers, including methods highly praised by their authors, such as Hydra, Sampars and GA + PR + LS. Trees of comparable or better scores can be obtained using the program TNT, but from one to three orders of magnitude faster. In some cases, the search methods are very similar to others long in use in phylogenetics, but the enormous speed differences seem to correspond more to poor implementations than to actual differences in the methods themselves.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cla.12082
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cla.12082/abstract
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectParsimony
dc.subjectPhylogeny
dc.subjectCladistics
dc.titleComputer science and parsimony: a reappraisal, with discussion of methods for poorly structured datasets
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución