dc.creatorErro, Eustaquio Martín
dc.creatorOrtiz, Patricia Ines
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-21T17:12:45Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-06T13:18:33Z
dc.date.available2017-12-21T17:12:45Z
dc.date.available2018-11-06T13:18:33Z
dc.date.created2017-12-21T17:12:45Z
dc.date.issued2014-06
dc.identifierOrtiz, Patricia Ines; Erro, Eustaquio Martín; A comparative study of different microchips for capillary electrophoresis with electrochemical detection; Springer; Journal of Applied Electrochemistry; 44; 12; 6-2014; 1393-1399
dc.identifier0021-891X
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/31233
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1874158
dc.description.abstractThis work describes a comparison of the performance of different microchip configuration for microchip capillary electrophoresis with electrochemical detection. Two electrodes gold and multistrand carbon fibers and two microchip construction materials polydimethylsiloxane/polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS/PDMS) and polydimethylsiloxane/glass hybrid (PDMS/glass) were analyzed. The electrode is integrated into the microchip for in-channel triple pulse amperometric detection. Two different mixtures were analyzed (i.e., paracetamol (PA)-4-aminophenol (4-AP) and Dopamine (DO)-Dopac) to demonstrate the electrode and microchips performance. Other variables, such as injection and separation potentials, buffer pH, surfactants addition and injection time, were also analyzed. Hydrodynamic voltammograms were used to select working potential values, and +0.9 V for PA and 4-AP and +0.8 V for DO and dopac were chosen. The migration potential was modified in the 1,500–2,500 V range, and the employed value depends on the microchip materials. The separation process was tested by analyzing the current and migration time variation coefficients. The experimental results demonstrated that the hybrid PDMS/glass microchip with a carbon fiber electrode exhibited a better performance for both samples analyzed.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10800-014-0764-1
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10800-014-0764-1
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectMicrochip capillary electrophoresis
dc.subjectGold and carbon fiber electrode
dc.subjectPDMS/PDMS and PDMS/glass microchip
dc.subjectTriple pulse amperometric detection
dc.titleA comparative study of different microchips for capillary electrophoresis with electrochemical detection
dc.typeArtículos de revistas
dc.typeArtículos de revistas
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución