Artículos de revistas
N and S concentration and stoichiometry in soybean during vegetative growth: Dynamics of indices for diagnosing the S status
Fecha
2016-11Registro en:
Divito, Guillermo Adrián; Echeverria, Hernan Eduardo; Andrade, Fernando Héctor; Sadras, Victor Oscar; N and S concentration and stoichiometry in soybean during vegetative growth: Dynamics of indices for diagnosing the S status; Elsevier Science; Field Crops Research; 198; 11-2016; 140-147
0378-4290
CONICET Digital
CONICET
Autor
Divito, Guillermo Adrián
Echeverria, Hernan Eduardo
Andrade, Fernando Héctor
Sadras, Victor Oscar
Resumen
Information regarding the pattern of sulphur (S) accumulation in shoots is scarce for field crops and few comprehensive analysis were performed on N:S stoichiometry. Particularly, the need to study the patterns of uptake, allocation and stoichiometry of S and N in soybean is two-fold. First, the main areas for soybean production in the world have been recently reported as S-deficient. Second, S concentration (%S) and N:S ratios are relevant for diagnosing S deficiency. The aim of this work was to analyze, in a gradient of S availability, the dynamics of nitrogen concentration (%N), %S and N:S ratio in soybean lamina, stem and shoots during vegetative growth. Experiments were performed at Balcarce, Argentina during two growing seasons. Two soybean cultivars were evaluated: DM2200 (maturity group II) and DM4970 (maturity group IV), sown in optimum dates for the region (mid-November). DM2200 was also sown late (early January). We sampled crops between biomass ≈ 1 Mg ha−1 and R5. Shoots were separated in lamina, stem and petiole, and pod. The adjusted S dilution curve for S-sufficient treatments was attenuated in soybean (S = 2.8 W−0.11), with no differences among cultivars of maturity groups II and IV, and sowing dates from November to January. For the same treatments, the N:S ratio was stable in shoots during vegetative growth (N:S = 12.2), supporting the use of a unique threshold for diagnosing the S status during this period. Sulphur concentration in stems was more responsive to the availability of S than%S in lamina. In addition, the concentration of N in stem tended to be constant with variation in %S while %N and %S correlated in lamina. This produced a greater response of N:S in stem than in lamina. Thus, the determination of%S and N:S in stem are good candidates as indicators of S status of soybean.