dc.creator | Cormick, Gabriela | |
dc.creator | Betran, Ana Pilar | |
dc.creator | Ciapponi, Agustín | |
dc.creator | Hall, David R. | |
dc.creator | Hofmyer, G. Justus | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-06-01T22:10:10Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-06-01T22:10:10Z | |
dc.date.created | 2018-06-01T22:10:10Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016-03 | |
dc.identifier | Cormick, Gabriela; Betran, Ana Pilar; Ciapponi, Agustín; Hall, David R.; Hofmyer, G. Justus; Inter-pregnancy interval and risk of recurrent pre-eclampsia: systematic review and meta-analysis; BioMed Central; Reproductive Health Matters (print); 13; 3-2016; 83-93 | |
dc.identifier | 0968-8080 | |
dc.identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/11336/47097 | |
dc.identifier | 1742-4755 | |
dc.identifier | CONICET Digital | |
dc.identifier | CONICET | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Women with a history of pre-eclampsia have a higher risk of developing pre-eclampsia in subsequentpregnancies. However, the role of the inter-pregnancy interval on this association is unclear.Objective: To explore the effect of inter-pregnancy interval on the risk of recurrent pre-eclampsia or eclampia.Search strategy: MEDLINE, EMBASE and LILACS were searched (inception to July 2015).Selection criteria: Cohort studies assessing the risk of recurrent pre-eclampsia in the immediate subsequentpregnancy according to different birth intervals.Data collection and analysis: Two reviewers independently performed screening, data extraction, methodologicaland quality assessment.Meta-analysis of adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) was used to measure the associationbetween various interval lengths and recurrent pre-eclampsia or eclampsia.Main results: We identified 1769 articles and finally included four studies with a total of 77,561 women. The meta-analysisof two studies showed that compared to inter-pregnancy intervals of 2?4 years, the aOR for recurrent pre-eclampsia was 1.01 [95 % CI 0.95 to 1.07, I2 0 %] with intervals of less than 2 years and 1.10 [95 % CI 1.02 to 1.19, I2 0 %] with intervals longerthan 4 years.Conclusion: Compared to inter-pregnancy intervals of 2 to 4 years, shorter intervals are not associated with an increasedrisk of recurrent pre-eclampsia but longer intervals appear to increase the risk. The results of this review should beinterpreted with caution as included studies are observational and thus subject to possible confounding factors.Keywords: Recurrence, Pre-eclampsia, Eclampsia, Inter-pregnancy interval, Birth interval, Meta-analysis, Systematic review,Birth spacing, Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.publisher | BioMed Central | |
dc.relation | info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-016-0197-x | |
dc.relation | info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4950816/ | |
dc.relation | info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://reproductive-health-journal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12978-016-0197-x | |
dc.rights | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/ | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.subject | Pregnancy | |
dc.subject | Pre-Eclampsia | |
dc.title | Inter-pregnancy interval and risk of recurrent pre-eclampsia: systematic review and meta-analysis | |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
dc.type | info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo | |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | |