dc.creatorCormick, Gabriela
dc.creatorBetran, Ana Pilar
dc.creatorCiapponi, Agustín
dc.creatorHall, David R.
dc.creatorHofmyer, G. Justus
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-01T22:10:10Z
dc.date.available2018-06-01T22:10:10Z
dc.date.created2018-06-01T22:10:10Z
dc.date.issued2016-03
dc.identifierCormick, Gabriela; Betran, Ana Pilar; Ciapponi, Agustín; Hall, David R.; Hofmyer, G. Justus; Inter-pregnancy interval and risk of recurrent pre-eclampsia: systematic review and meta-analysis; BioMed Central; Reproductive Health Matters (print); 13; 3-2016; 83-93
dc.identifier0968-8080
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/47097
dc.identifier1742-4755
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.description.abstractBackground: Women with a history of pre-eclampsia have a higher risk of developing pre-eclampsia in subsequentpregnancies. However, the role of the inter-pregnancy interval on this association is unclear.Objective: To explore the effect of inter-pregnancy interval on the risk of recurrent pre-eclampsia or eclampia.Search strategy: MEDLINE, EMBASE and LILACS were searched (inception to July 2015).Selection criteria: Cohort studies assessing the risk of recurrent pre-eclampsia in the immediate subsequentpregnancy according to different birth intervals.Data collection and analysis: Two reviewers independently performed screening, data extraction, methodologicaland quality assessment.Meta-analysis of adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) was used to measure the associationbetween various interval lengths and recurrent pre-eclampsia or eclampsia.Main results: We identified 1769 articles and finally included four studies with a total of 77,561 women. The meta-analysisof two studies showed that compared to inter-pregnancy intervals of 2?4 years, the aOR for recurrent pre-eclampsia was 1.01 [95 % CI 0.95 to 1.07, I2 0 %] with intervals of less than 2 years and 1.10 [95 % CI 1.02 to 1.19, I2 0 %] with intervals longerthan 4 years.Conclusion: Compared to inter-pregnancy intervals of 2 to 4 years, shorter intervals are not associated with an increasedrisk of recurrent pre-eclampsia but longer intervals appear to increase the risk. The results of this review should beinterpreted with caution as included studies are observational and thus subject to possible confounding factors.Keywords: Recurrence, Pre-eclampsia, Eclampsia, Inter-pregnancy interval, Birth interval, Meta-analysis, Systematic review,Birth spacing, Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherBioMed Central
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-016-0197-x
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4950816/
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://reproductive-health-journal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12978-016-0197-x
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectPregnancy
dc.subjectPre-Eclampsia
dc.titleInter-pregnancy interval and risk of recurrent pre-eclampsia: systematic review and meta-analysis
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución