dc.creatorMuñoz Jaramillo, Andrés
dc.creatorDasi Espuig, María
dc.creatorBalmaceda, Laura Antonia
dc.creatorDeluca, Edward
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-12T15:39:34Z
dc.date.available2015-08-12T15:39:34Z
dc.date.created2015-08-12T15:39:34Z
dc.date.issued2013-04-02
dc.identifierMuñoz Jaramillo, Andrés; Dasi Espuig, María; Balmaceda, Laura Antonia; Deluca, Edward; Solar Cycle Propagation, Memory, and Prediction: Insights from a Century of Magnetic Proxies; IOP Publishing; The Astrophysical Journal Letters; 767; 25; 2-4-2013; 1-7
dc.identifier2041-8205
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/1644
dc.description.abstractThe solar cycle and its associated magnetic activity are the main drivers behind changes in the interplanetary environment and Earth’s upper atmosphere (commonly referred to as space weather). These changes have a direct impact on the lifetime of space-based assets and can create hazards to astronauts in space. In recent years there has been an effort to develop accurate solar cycle predictions (with aims at predicting the long-term evolution of space weather), leading to nearly a hundred widely spread predictions for the amplitude of solar cycle 24. A major contributor to the disagreement is the lack of direct long-term databases covering different components of the solar magnetic field (toroidal versus poloidal). Here, we use sunspot area and polar faculae measurements spanning a full century (as our toroidal and poloidal field proxies) to study solar cycle propagation, memory, and prediction. Our results substantiate predictions based on the polar magnetic fields, whereas we find sunspot area to be uncorrelated with cycle amplitude unless multiplied by area-weighted average tilt. This suggests that the joint assimilation of tilt and sunspot area is a better choice (with aims to cycle prediction) than sunspot area alone, and adds to the evidence in favor of active region emergence and decay as the main mechanism of poloidal field generation (i.e., the Babcock–Leighton mechanism). Finally, by looking at the correlation between our poloidal and toroidal proxies across multiple cycles, we find solar cycle memory to be limited to only one cycle.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherIOP Publishing
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1088/2041-8205/767/2/L25
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://iopscience.iop.org/2041-8205/767/2/L25/pdf/2041-8205_767_2_L25.pdf
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://arxiv.org/abs/1304.3151
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectSolar Activity
dc.subjectSolar Dynamo
dc.subjectSurface Magnetism
dc.titleSolar Cycle Propagation, Memory, and Prediction: Insights from a Century of Magnetic Proxies
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución