dc.creatorGuerrero, Federico Nicolás
dc.creatorSpinelli, Enrique Mario
dc.creatorHaberman, Marcelo Alejandro
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-09T15:27:42Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-06T12:17:59Z
dc.date.available2018-08-09T15:27:42Z
dc.date.available2018-11-06T12:17:59Z
dc.date.created2018-08-09T15:27:42Z
dc.date.issued2016-06
dc.identifierGuerrero, Federico Nicolás; Spinelli, Enrique Mario; Haberman, Marcelo Alejandro; Analysis and Simple Circuit Design of Double Differential EMG Active Electrode; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers; IEEE Transactions On Biomedical Circuits And Systems; 10; 3; 6-2016; 787-795
dc.identifier1932-4545
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/54778
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1865270
dc.description.abstractIn this paper we present an analysis of the voltage amplifier needed for double differential (DD) sEMG measurements and a novel, very simple circuit for implementing DD active electrodes. The three-input amplifier that standalone DD active electrodes require is inherently different from a differential amplifier, and general knowledge about its design is scarce in the literature. First, the figures of merit of the amplifier are defined through a decomposition of its input signal into three orthogonal modes. This analysis reveals a mode containing EMG crosstalk components that the DD electrode should reject. Then, the effect of finite input impedance is analyzed. Because there are three terminals, minimum bounds for interference rejection ratios due to electrode and input impedance unbalances with two degrees of freedom are obtained. Finally, a novel circuit design is presented, including only a quadruple operational amplifier and a few passive components. This design is nearly as simple as the branched electrode and much simpler than the three instrumentation amplifier design, while providing robust EMG crosstalk rejection and better input impedance using unity gain buffers for each electrode input. The interference rejection limits of this input stage are analyzed. An easily replicable implementation of the proposed circuit is described, together with a parameter design guideline to adjust it to specific needs. The electrode is compared with the established alternatives, and sample sEMG signals are obtained, acquired on different body locations with dry contacts, successfully rejecting interference sources.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TBCAS.2015.2492944
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7362246/
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectACTIVE ELECTRODES
dc.subjectBIOMEDICAL SENSORS
dc.subjectDOUBLE DIFFERENTIAL ELECTRODES
dc.subjectDRY ELECTRODES
dc.subjectSURFACE ELECTROMYOGRAPHY
dc.titleAnalysis and Simple Circuit Design of Double Differential EMG Active Electrode
dc.typeArtículos de revistas
dc.typeArtículos de revistas
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución