dc.creatorSugita, Takafumi
dc.creatorAkiyoshi, Hideharu
dc.creatorWolfram, Elian Augusto
dc.creatorSalvador, Jacobo Omar
dc.creatorOhyama, Hirofumi
dc.creatorMizuno, Akira
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-09T18:52:06Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-06T12:14:27Z
dc.date.available2018-04-09T18:52:06Z
dc.date.available2018-11-06T12:14:27Z
dc.date.created2018-04-09T18:52:06Z
dc.date.issued2017-12
dc.identifierSugita, Takafumi; Akiyoshi, Hideharu; Wolfram, Elian Augusto; Salvador, Jacobo Omar; Ohyama, Hirofumi; et al.; Comparison of ozone profiles from DIAL, MLS, and chemical transport model simulations over Río Gallegos, Argentina, during the spring Antarctic vortex breakup, 2009; Copernicus GmbH; Atmospheric Measurement Techniques; 10; 12; 12-2017; 4947-4964
dc.identifier1867-8548
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/41376
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1864691
dc.description.abstractThis study evaluates the agreement between ozone profiles derived from the ground-based differential absorption lidar (DIAL), satellite-borne Aura Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS), and 3-D chemical transport model (CTM) simulations such as the Model for Interdisciplinary Research on Climate (MIROC-CTM) over the Atmospheric Observatory of Southern Patagonia (Observatorio Atmosférico de la Patagonia Austral, OAPA; 51.6°S, 69.3°W) in Río Gallegos, Argentina, from September to November 2009. In this austral spring, measurements were performed in the vicinity of the polar vortex and inside it on some occasions; they revealed the variability in the potential vorticity (PV) of measured air masses. Comparisons between DIAL and MLS were performed between 6 and 100hPa with 500km and 24h coincidence criteria. The results show a good agreement between DIAL and MLS with mean differences of ±0.1ppmv (MLS-´DIAL, n,=-) between 6 and 56hPa. MIROC-CTM also agrees with DIAL, with mean differences of ±0.3ppmv (MIROC-CTM-´DIAL, n,=-23) between 10 and 56hPa. Both comparisons provide mean differences of 0.5ppmv (MLS) to 0.8-0.9ppmv (MIROC-CTM) at the 83-100hPa levels. DIAL tends to underestimate ozone values at this lower altitude region. Between 6 and 8hPa, the MIROC-CTM ozone value is 0.4-0.6ppmv (5-8%) smaller than those from DIAL. Applying the scaled PV (sPV) criterion for matching pairs in the DIAL-MLS comparison, the variability in the difference decreases 21-47% between 10 and 56hPa. However, the mean differences are small for all pressure levels, except 6hPa. Because ground measurement sites in the Southern Hemisphere (SH) are very sparse at mid-to high latitudes, i.e., 35-60°S, the OAPA site is important for evaluating the bias and long-Term stability of satellite instruments. The good performance of this DIAL system will be useful for such purposes in the future.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherCopernicus GmbH
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-4947-2017
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/10/4947/2017/
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectDIAL
dc.subjectOZONE PROFILE
dc.subjectMLS
dc.titleComparison of ozone profiles from DIAL, MLS, and chemical transport model simulations over Río Gallegos, Argentina, during the spring Antarctic vortex breakup, 2009
dc.typeArtículos de revistas
dc.typeArtículos de revistas
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución