dc.creatorMartino, Diego Javier
dc.creatorSamame, Cecilia
dc.creatorStrejilevich, Sergio
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-08T15:06:13Z
dc.date.available2018-06-08T15:06:13Z
dc.date.created2018-06-08T15:06:13Z
dc.date.issued2017-05
dc.identifierMartino, Diego Javier; Samame, Cecilia; Strejilevich, Sergio; Awaiting accurate scientific evidence: Progression or “profiles” in bipolar disorder?; Springer Open; International Journal of Bipolar Disorders; 5; 1; 5-2017
dc.identifier2194-7511
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/47864
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.description.abstractThis letter is written in response to a review recently published in the journal. The aim is to highlight a potential meth- odological limitation common to many studies comparing bipolar patients with few previous episodes versus those with multiple episodes, and in which the results are interpreted as indicating the longitudinal course of the illness.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherSpringer Open
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40345-017-0087-3
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://journalbipolardisorders.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40345-017-0087-3
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectBipolar Disorder
dc.subjectResponse to Treatment
dc.subjectStaging
dc.subjectNeuroprogression
dc.titleAwaiting accurate scientific evidence: Progression or “profiles” in bipolar disorder?
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución