dc.creatorEstrada Campuzano, Gaspar
dc.creatorSlafer, Gustavo Ariel
dc.creatorMiralles, Daniel Julio
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-23T19:44:53Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-06T11:51:19Z
dc.date.available2017-05-23T19:44:53Z
dc.date.available2018-11-06T11:51:19Z
dc.date.created2017-05-23T19:44:53Z
dc.date.issued2012-03
dc.identifierEstrada Campuzano, Gaspar; Slafer, Gustavo Ariel; Miralles, Daniel Julio; Differences in yield, biomass and their components between triticale and wheat grown under contrasting water and nitrogen environments; Elsevier Science; Field Crops Research; 128; 1; 3-2012; 167-179
dc.identifier0378-4290
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/16891
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1860227
dc.description.abstractA number of evidences have shown that triticale produces more above-ground dry matter (AGDM) than other winter cereals indry environments.AsAGDMaccumulated by crop before anthesishas beenpointed out as an important attribute under rainfed environments, the comparison of its physiological attributes (i.e. accumulated intercepted radiation – IPAR and radiation use efficiency – RUE), comparing among different cultivars and respect to other cereals, could be valuable to identify prospective traits to be used in breeding programs. Three experiments were carried out during the 2004 and 2005 growing seasons to (i) determine the effect of water stress on the yield and the eco-physiological components of biomass (i.e. accumulated intercepted radiation and RUE throughout the crop cycle) in a wide range of triticale cultivars to evaluate the genotypic variability (in interaction with water regime) for those traits and (ii) to analyze the causes for the commonly found differences in yield and AGDM between triticale and wheat under different water and nitrogen conditions. The triticale cultivars showed an important variability in yield and yield components sensitivity to drought. Water restrictions reduced AGDM, more than its partitioning to the reproductive organs, due to reductions in crop growth rate mainly through reduced RUE when different triticale cultivars were analyzed. Triticale outyielded wheat due to an increased biomass at anthesis and at maturity associated with higher RUE, probably due to a better light distribution into the canopy, more than by differences in IPAR. Triticale advantages were especially noticeable in the Mediterranean-type environment where yield and biomass were almosttwice than that of wheat, associated with differences of similar magnitude in RUE.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevier Science
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.01.003
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429012000056
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectTriticale
dc.subjectBiomass
dc.subjectIntercepted radiation
dc.subjectRadiation use efficiency
dc.titleDifferences in yield, biomass and their components between triticale and wheat grown under contrasting water and nitrogen environments
dc.typeArtículos de revistas
dc.typeArtículos de revistas
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución