dc.creatorLandmann, Claire
dc.creatorLandi, Sofía Mariana
dc.creatorGrafton, Scott T.
dc.creatorDella Maggiore, Valeria Monica
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-11T18:55:50Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-06T11:42:42Z
dc.date.available2017-05-11T18:55:50Z
dc.date.available2018-11-06T11:42:42Z
dc.date.created2017-05-11T18:55:50Z
dc.date.issued2011-11
dc.identifierLandmann, Claire; Landi, Sofía Mariana; Grafton, Scott T.; Della Maggiore, Valeria Monica; fMRI supports the sensorimotor theory of motor resonance; Public Library of Science; Plos One; 6; 11; 11-2011; 1-8, e26859
dc.identifier1932-6203
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/16324
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1858252
dc.description.abstractThe neural mechanisms mediating the activation of the motor system during action observation, also known as motor resonance, are of major interest to the field of motor control. It has been proposed that motor resonance develops in infants through Hebbian plasticity of pathways connecting sensory and motor regions that fire simultaneously during imitation or self movement observation. A fundamental problem when testing this theory in adults is that most experimental paradigms involve actions that have been overpracticed throughout life. Here, we directly tested the sensorimotor theory of motor resonance by creating new visuomotor representations using abstract stimuli (motor symbols) and identifying the neural networks recruited through fMRI. We predicted that the network recruited during action observation and execution would overlap with that recruited during observation of new motor symbols. Our results indicate that a network consisting of premotor and posterior parietal cortex, the supplementary motor area, the inferior frontal gyrus and cerebellum was activated both by new motor symbols and by direct observation of the corresponding action. This tight spatial overlap underscores the importance of sensorimotor learning for motor resonance and further indicates that the physical characteristics of the perceived stimulus are irrelevant to the evoked response in the observer.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0026859
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026859
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3206875/
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectMotor resonance
dc.subjectAction observation
dc.subjectSensorimotor learning
dc.subjectFronto-parietal networks
dc.titlefMRI supports the sensorimotor theory of motor resonance
dc.typeArtículos de revistas
dc.typeArtículos de revistas
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución