dc.creatorMaine, Maria Alejandra
dc.creatorHadad, Hernán Ricardo
dc.creatorSánchez, Gabriela Cristina
dc.creatorCaffaratti, Sandra Ester
dc.creatorPedro, María del Carmen
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-19T21:43:01Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-06T11:38:09Z
dc.date.available2017-05-19T21:43:01Z
dc.date.available2018-11-06T11:38:09Z
dc.date.created2017-05-19T21:43:01Z
dc.date.issued2016-10
dc.identifierMaine, Maria Alejandra; Hadad, Hernán Ricardo; Sánchez, Gabriela Cristina; Caffaratti, Sandra Ester; Pedro, María del Carmen; Kinetics of Cr(III) and Cr(VI) removal from water by two floating macrophytes; Taylor & Francis; International Journal Of Phytoremediation; 18; 3; 10-2016; 261-268
dc.identifier1522-6514
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/16796
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1856430
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this work was to compare Cr(III) and Cr(VI) removal kinetics from water by Pistia stratiotes and Salvinia herzogii. The accumulation in plant tissues and the effects of both Cr forms on plant growth were also evaluated. Plants were exposed to 2 and 6 mg L−1 of Cr(III) or Cr(VI) during 30 days. At the end of the experiment, Cr(VI) removal percentages were significantly lower than those obtained for Cr(III) for both macrophytes. Cr(III) removal kinetics involved a fast and a slow component. The fast component was primarily responsible for Cr(III) removal while Cr(VI) removal kinetics involved only a slow process. Cr accumulated principally in the roots. In the Cr(VI) treatments a higher translocation from roots to aerial parts than in Cr(III) treatments was observed. Both macrophytes demonstrated a high ability to remove Cr(III) but not Cr(VI). Cr(III) inhibited the growth at the highest studied concentration of both macrophytes while Cr(VI) caused senescence. These results have important implications in the use of constructed wetlands for secondary industrial wastewater treatment. Common primary treatments of effluents containing Cr(VI) consists in its reduction to Cr(III). Cr(III) concentrations in these effluents are normally below the highest studied concentrations in this work.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2015.1085829
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectMETAL
dc.subjectUPTAKE EFFICIENCY
dc.subjectPHYTOREMEDIATION,
dc.subjectWETLANDS
dc.titleKinetics of Cr(III) and Cr(VI) removal from water by two floating macrophytes
dc.typeArtículos de revistas
dc.typeArtículos de revistas
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución