dc.creatorRodriguez, Anabel
dc.creatorRodriguez, Maria Marcela
dc.creatorLemoine, María Laura
dc.creatorMascheroni, Rodolfo Horacio
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-28T16:15:49Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-06T11:37:27Z
dc.date.available2018-08-28T16:15:49Z
dc.date.available2018-11-06T11:37:27Z
dc.date.created2018-08-28T16:15:49Z
dc.date.issued2017-04
dc.identifierRodriguez, Anabel; Rodriguez, Maria Marcela; Lemoine, María Laura; Mascheroni, Rodolfo Horacio; Study and comparison of different drying processes for dehydration of raspberries; Taylor & Francis; Drying Technology; 35; 6; 4-2017; 689-698
dc.identifier0737-3937
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/57345
dc.identifier1532-2300
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1856101
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare different drying methods (microwave, hot air + microwave, and osmotic dehydration + microwave) in raspberries (cv. Heritage). A portion of raspberries was pretreated with osmotic dehydration (60°Brix sucrose solution at 20°C for 360 min) and another with hot air drying (HAD) (1.5 m/s air speed at 60°C for 300 min). Pretreated raspberries were then dried by microwave and at three different intensities (3.5, 7.5, and 11 W/g). Physicochemical properties (moisture content, water activity, and drying rate) and quality parameters (optical properties, mechanical properties, antioxidant capacity, and rehydration capacity) of dried raspberries were evaluated. Results showed that the microwave drying (MWD) at 7.5 W/g (50 min and final temperature of 79 ± 5.1°C) allowed a high yield of dried raspberries. The combined processes were not efficient to accelerate the decrease of moisture content, due to the low drying rate of the pretreatments. In terms of quality, none of the drying processes allowed a high retention of the antioxidant capacity. However, they allowed an appropriate rehydration performance. The combination of HAD with MWD allowed obtaining a good appearance and desirable texture on the dried product. Thus, this last option seems to be the best among the drying methods tested, but additional studies are required to improve the efficiency of the process and the effect on the antioxidant capacity during drying.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2016.1202958
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07373937.2016.1202958
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectCOMBINED DRYING
dc.subjectDRYING RATE
dc.subjectQUALITY PARAMETERS
dc.subjectRASPBERRIES
dc.titleStudy and comparison of different drying processes for dehydration of raspberries
dc.typeArtículos de revistas
dc.typeArtículos de revistas
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución