Artículos de revistas
Socioeconomic Status Is Not Related with Facial Fluctuating Asymmetry: Evidence from Latin-American Populations
Fecha
2017-01Registro en:
Quinto Sanchez, Mirsha Emmanuel; Cintas, Celia; Silva de Cerqueira, Caio Cesar; Ramallo, Virginia; Acuña Alonzo, Victor; et al.; Socioeconomic Status Is Not Related with Facial Fluctuating Asymmetry: Evidence from Latin-American Populations; Public Library of Science; Plos One; 12; 1; 1-2017; e0169287
1932-6203
CONICET Digital
CONICET
Autor
Quinto Sanchez, Mirsha Emmanuel
Cintas, Celia
Silva de Cerqueira, Caio Cesar
Ramallo, Virginia
Acuña Alonzo, Victor
Adhikari, Kaustubh
Castillo, Lucía Daniela
Gomez Valdés, Jorge
Everardo, Paola
De Avila, Francisco
Hünemeier, Tábita
Jaramillo, Claudia
Arias, Williams
Fuentes, Macarena
Gallo, Carla
Poletti, Giovani
Schuler Faccini, Lavinia
Bortolini, Maria Catira
Canizales Quinteros, Samuel
Rothhammer, Francisco
Bedoya, Gabriel
Rosique, Javier
Ruiz Linares, Andrés
González José, Rolando
Resumen
The expression of facial asymmetries has been recurrently related with poverty and/or disadvantaged socioeconomic status. Departing from the developmental instability theory, previous approaches attempted to test the statistical relationship between the stress experienced by individuals grown in poor conditions and an increase in facial and corporal asymmetry.Here we aim to further evaluate such hypothesis on a large sample of admixed Latin Americans individuals by exploring if low socioeconomic status individuals tend to exhibit greater facial fluctuating asymmetry values. To do so, we implement Procrustes analysis of variance and Hierarchical Linear Modelling (HLM) to estimate potential associationsbetween facial fluctuating asymmetry values and socioeconomic status. We report significant relationships between facial fluctuating asymmetry values and age, sex, and genetic ancestry, while socioeconomic status failed to exhibit any strong statistical relationship with facial asymmetry. These results are persistent after the effect of heterozygosity (a proxy for genetic ancestry) is controlled in the model. Our results indicate that, at least on the studied sample, there is no relationship between socioeconomic stress (as intended as low socioeconomicstatus) and facial asymmetries.