dc.creator | Leiguarda, Ramón Carlos | |
dc.creator | Clarens, María Florencia | |
dc.creator | Amengual, Alejandra | |
dc.creator | Drucaroff, Lucas Javier | |
dc.creator | Hallett, Mark | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-02-27T20:14:39Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-11-06T11:32:56Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-02-27T20:14:39Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-11-06T11:32:56Z | |
dc.date.created | 2018-02-27T20:14:39Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-10 | |
dc.identifier | Leiguarda, Ramón Carlos; Clarens, María Florencia; Amengual, Alejandra; Drucaroff, Lucas Javier; Hallett, Mark; Short apraxia screening test; Taylor & Francis; Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology; 36; 8; 10-2014; 867-874 | |
dc.identifier | 1380-3395 | |
dc.identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/11336/37341 | |
dc.identifier | CONICET Digital | |
dc.identifier | CONICET | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1854604 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Limb apraxia comprises many different and common disorders, which are largely unrecognized essentially because there is no easy-to-use screening test sensitive enough to identify all types of limb praxis deficits. Method: We evaluated 70 right-handed patients with limb apraxia due to a single focal lesion of the left hemisphere and 40 normal controls, using a new apraxia screening test. The test covered 12 items including: intransitive gestures, transitive gestures elicited under verbal, visual, and tactile modalities, imitation of meaningful and meaningless postures and movements, and a multiple object test. Results: Interrater reliability was maximum for a cutoff of >2 positive items identifying apraxia on the short battery (Cohen's kappa.918, p <.0001), and somewhat less for >3 items (Cohen's kappa.768, p <.0001). Although both results were statistically significant, >2 was higher, indicating greater apraxia diagnosis agreement between raters at this cutoff value. Conclusions: The screening test proved to have high specificity and sensitivity to diagnose every type of upper limb praxis deficit, thus showing advantages over previously published tests. | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | |
dc.relation | info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2014.951315 | |
dc.relation | info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13803395.2014.951315 | |
dc.rights | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess | |
dc.subject | APRAXIA EVALUATION | |
dc.subject | SCREENING TEST | |
dc.subject | SENSITIVITY | |
dc.subject | SPECIFICITY | |
dc.title | Short apraxia screening test | |
dc.type | Artículos de revistas | |
dc.type | Artículos de revistas | |
dc.type | Artículos de revistas | |