dc.creatorSegura, Diego Fernando
dc.creatorNussenbaum, Ana Laura
dc.creatorViscarret, MM
dc.creatorDevescovi, Francisco
dc.creatorBachmann, Guillermo Enrique
dc.creatorCorley, Juan Carlos
dc.creatorOvruski, Sergio M.
dc.creatorCladera, Jorge Luis
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-27T21:31:02Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-06T11:30:04Z
dc.date.available2018-02-27T21:31:02Z
dc.date.available2018-11-06T11:30:04Z
dc.date.created2018-02-27T21:31:02Z
dc.date.issued2016-03
dc.identifierSegura, Diego Fernando; Nussenbaum, Ana Laura; Viscarret, MM; Devescovi, Francisco; Bachmann, Guillermo Enrique; et al.; Innate host habitat preference in the parasitoid Diachasmimorpha longicaudata: Functional significance and modifications through learning; Public Library of Science; Plos One; 11; 3; 3-2016; 1-18
dc.identifier1932-6203
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/37363
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1853566
dc.description.abstractParasitoids searching for polyphagous herbivores can find their hosts in a variety of habitats. Under this scenario, chemical cues from the host habitat (not related to the host) represent poor indicators of host location. Hence, it is unlikely that naïve females show a strong response to host habitat cues, which would become important only if the parasitoids learn to associate such cues to the host presence. This concept does not consider that habitats can vary in profitability or host nutritional quality, which according to the optimal foraging theory and the preference-performance hypothesis (respectively) could shape the way in which parasitoids make use of chemical cues from the host habitat. We assessed innate preference in the fruit fly parasitoid Diachasmimorpha longicaudata among chemical cues from four host habitats (apple, fig, orange and peach) using a Y-tube olfactometer. Contrary to what was predicted, we found a hierarchic pattern of preference. The parasitism rate realized on these fruit species and the weight of the host correlates positively, to some extent, with the preference pattern, whereas preference did not correlate with survival and fecundity of the progeny. As expected for a parasitoid foraging for generalist hosts, habitat preference changed markedly depending on their previous experience and the abundance of hosts. These findings suggest that the pattern of preference for host habitats is attributable to differences in encounter rate and host quality. Host habitat preference seems to be, however, quite plastic and easily modified according to the information obtained during foraging.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0152222
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152222
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjecta
dc.titleInnate host habitat preference in the parasitoid Diachasmimorpha longicaudata: Functional significance and modifications through learning
dc.typeArtículos de revistas
dc.typeArtículos de revistas
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución