dc.creatorStover, Juliana Beatriz
dc.creatorFreiberg Hoffmann, Agustín
dc.creatorde la Iglesia, Guadalupe
dc.creatorFernandez Liporace, Maria Mercedes
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-30T19:50:19Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-06T11:26:12Z
dc.date.available2018-01-30T19:50:19Z
dc.date.available2018-11-06T11:26:12Z
dc.date.created2018-01-30T19:50:19Z
dc.date.issued2014-04
dc.identifierStover, Juliana Beatriz; Freiberg Hoffmann, Agustín; de la Iglesia, Guadalupe; Fernandez Liporace, Maria Mercedes; Predicting academic achievement: The role of motivation and learning strategies; Scientific Methodical Center Scientia Educologica; Problems of Psychology in the 21th Century; 8; 1; 4-2014; 71-84
dc.identifier2029-8587
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/35116
dc.identifier2538-7197
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1851655
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study consists in testing a predictive model of academic achievement including motivation and learning strategies as predictors. Motivation is defined as the energy and the direction of behaviors; it is categorized in three types of motivation –intrinsic, extrinsic and amotivation (Deci & Ryan, 1985). Learning strategies are deliberate operations oriented towards information processing in academic activities (Valle, Barca, González & Núñez, 1999). Several studies analysed the relationship between motivation and learning strategies in high school and college environments. Students with higher academic achievement were intrinsically motivated and used a wider variety of learning strategies more frequently. A non-experimental predictive design was developed. The sample was composed by 459 students (55.2% high-schoolers; 44.8% college students). Data were gathered by means of sociodemographic and academic surveys, and also by the local versions of the Academic Motivation Scale –EMA, Echelle de Motivation en Éducation (Stover, de la Iglesia, Rial Boubeta & Fernández Liporace, 2012; Vallerand, Blais, Briere & Pelletier, 1989) and the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory –LASSI (Stover, Uriel & Fernández Liporace, 2012; Weinstein, Schulte & Palmer, 1987). Several path analyses were carried out to test a hypothetical model to predict academic achievement (Kline, 1998). Results indicated that selfdetermined motivation explained academic achievement through the use of learning strategies. The final model obtained an excellent fit (χ2=16.523, df= 6, p=0.011; GFI=0.987; AGFI=0.955; SRMR=0.0320; NFI=0.913; IFI=0.943; CFI=0.940). Results are discussed considering Self Determination Theory and previous research.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherScientific Methodical Center Scientia Educologica
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.jbse.webinfo.lt/PPC/Problems_of_Psychology.htm
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://oaji.net/articles/2014/444-1403294062.pdf
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/ppc/?q=node/91
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT
dc.subjectLEARNING STRATEGIES
dc.subjectMOTIVATION
dc.subjectSTUDENTS
dc.titlePredicting academic achievement: The role of motivation and learning strategies
dc.typeArtículos de revistas
dc.typeArtículos de revistas
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución