dc.creatorSatne, Glenda Lucila
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-06T19:42:33Z
dc.date.available2018-02-06T19:42:33Z
dc.date.created2018-02-06T19:42:33Z
dc.date.issued2014-07
dc.identifierSatne, Glenda Lucila; Interaction and self-correction; Frontiers; Frontiers in Psychology; 5; 7-2014; 1-11
dc.identifier1664-1078
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/35869
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.description.abstractIn this paper I address the question of how to account for the normative dimension involved in conceptual competence in a naturalistic framework. First, I present what I call the Naturalist Challenge (NC), referring to both the phylogenetic and ontogenetic dimensions of conceptual possession and acquisition. I then criticize two models that have been dominant in thinking about conceptual competence, the interpretationist and the causalist models. Both fail to meet NC, by failing to account for the abilities involved in conceptual self-correction. I then offer an alternative account of self-correction that I develop with the help of the interactionist theory of mutual understanding arising from recent developments in Phenomenology and Developmental Psychology.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherFrontiers
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00798
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00798/full
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectInteraction
dc.subjectNormativity
dc.subjectSelf-Correction
dc.subjectNaturalism
dc.subjectEvolution
dc.subjectConceptual Abilities
dc.titleInteraction and self-correction
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución