dc.creatorDrummond, Karla Rezende Guerra
dc.creatorMalerbi, Fernando Korn
dc.creatorMorales, Paulo Henrique
dc.creatorMattos, Tessa Cerqueira Lemos
dc.creatorPinheiro, André Araújo
dc.creatorMallmann, Felipe
dc.creatorPerez, Ricardo Vessoni
dc.creatorLeal, Franz Schubert Lopes
dc.creatorMelo, Laura Gomes Nunes de
dc.creatorGomes, Marília Brito
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-18T04:12:45Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-04T17:14:38Z
dc.date.available2018-03-18T04:12:45Z
dc.date.available2018-07-04T17:14:38Z
dc.date.created2018-03-18T04:12:45Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifierDiabetology & Metabolic Syndrome. 2018 Mar 14;10(1):17
dc.identifierhttp://www.producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/51560
dc.identifier10.1186/s13098-018-0319-4
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1646597
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Diabetic retinopathy has a significant impact in every healthcare system. Despite that fact, there are few accurate estimates in the prevalence of DR in Brazil’s different geographic regions, particularly proliferative DR and diabetic macular edema. This study aims to determine the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in Brazil’s five continental regions and its determinant factors. Methods This multi center, cross-sectional, observational study, conducted between August 2011 and December 2014, included patients with type 1 diabetes from the 5 Brazilian geographic regions (South, Southeast, North, Northeast and Midwest). During a clinical visit, a structured questionnaire was applied, blood sampling was collected and each patient underwent mydriatic binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy evaluation. Results Data was obtained from 1644 patients, aged 30.2 ± 12 years (56.1% female, 54.4% Caucasian), with a diabetes duration of 15.5 ± 9.3 years. The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy was 242 (36.1%) in the Southeast, 102 (42.9%) in the South, 183 (29.9%) in the North and Northeast and 54 (41.7%) in the Midwest. Multinomial regression showed no difference in the prevalence of non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy in each geographic region, although, prevalence of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (p = 0.022), and diabetic macular edema (p = 0.003) was higher in the Midwest. Stepwise analyses reviled duration of diabetes, level of HbA1c and hypertension as independent variables. Conclusions The prevalence of non proliferative diabetic retinopathy in patients with type 1 diabetes was no different between each geographic region of Brazil. The Midwest presented higher prevalence of proliferative diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema. Duration of DM and glycemic control is of central importance to all. Hypertension is another fundamental factor to every region, at special in the South and Southeast. Glycemic control and patients in social and economic vulnerability deserves special attention in the North and Northeast of Brazil.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherBioMed Central
dc.relationDiabetology and Metabolic Syndrome
dc.rightsThe Author(s)
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.subjectDiabetic retinopathy
dc.subjectDiabetic macular edema
dc.subjectRisk factors
dc.titleRegional differences in the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy: a multi center study in Brazil
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución