dc.creatorCosta, Fabricia Vianna
dc.creatorCampos, Luiza Mello de Paiva
dc.creatorAyala, Mirko Dennys
dc.creatorMiranda Junior, Walter Gomes
dc.creatorBrandt, William Cunha
dc.creatorRoman-Torres, Caio Vinicius Gonçalves
dc.creatorBoaro, Letícia Cristina Cidreira
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-20T15:50:15Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-04T17:14:14Z
dc.date.available2017-12-20T15:50:15Z
dc.date.available2018-07-04T17:14:14Z
dc.date.created2017-12-20T15:50:15Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifierApplied Adhesion Science. 2017 Nov 25;5(1):18
dc.identifierhttp://www.producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/51475
dc.identifier10.1186/s40563-017-0098-4
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1646512
dc.description.abstractAbstract In order to simplify the technique while maintaining its effective clinical performance, as well as its adhesive properties, universal adhesive systems are constantly launched in the market. Thus, the objective of this study was to compare the presence or absence of moisture in the adhesion technique using a universal adhesive system, the Single Bond Universal (3M ESPE). There were selected forty-five human molars with indications for exodontia that were divided into three experimental groups: Single Bond Universal (3M ESPE) with and without moisture in the dentin; Scotchbond Multi-Bottles (3M ESPE) conventional technique (control). The characterization methods used were: microshear and scanning electron microscopy. Statistical analysis of variance analysis (single-factor ANOVA) and Tukey’s multiple comparison, global significance level of 5% were used. It was observed through the micro-test that there were no statistically significant differences between the groups tested. Scanning electron microscopy analysis showed that the most frequent failure mode was the adhesive type (91%), followed by the mixed type fracture (8%) and the cohesive type (1%). It was concluded through this study that, regardless of the moisture (present or absent), the Single Bond Universal adhesive system showed bond strength similar to the conventional adhesive.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherBioMed Central
dc.relationApplied Adhesion Science
dc.rightsThe Author(s)
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.subjectAdhesive systems
dc.subjectBond strength
dc.subjectUniversal adhesive
dc.titleComparison of different adhesive techniques using a universal adhesive system
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución