dc.creatorComachio, Josielli
dc.creatorMagalhães, Mauricio Oliveira
dc.creatorBurke, Thomaz Nogueira
dc.creatorRamos, Luiz Armando Vidal
dc.creatorAlmeida, Gabriel Peixoto Leão
dc.creatorSilva, Ana Paula M. C. C.
dc.creatorMeneses, Sarah Rubia Ferreira de
dc.creatorCosta Frutuoso, Jecilene Rosana
dc.creatorAmorim, Cinthia Santos Miotto de
dc.creatorMarques, Amelia Pasqual
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-15T18:02:15Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-04T17:06:27Z
dc.date.available2015-10-15T18:02:15Z
dc.date.available2018-07-04T17:06:27Z
dc.date.created2015-10-15T18:02:15Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifierTrials. 2015 Oct 15;16(1):469
dc.identifierhttp://www.producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/49162
dc.identifier10.1186/s13063-015-0850-7
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1644742
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Previous studies have shown that acupuncture and electroacupuncture (EA) are effective in the treatment of patients with low back pain. However, there is little evidence to support the use of one intervention over the other. The aim of this study is to compare the effect of acupuncture and electroacupuncture in the treatment of pain and disability in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. Methods/design The study design is a randomized controlled trial. Patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain of more than three months duration are recruited at Rehabilitation Center of Taboao da Serra - SP (Brazil). After examination, sixty-six patients will be randomized into one of two groups: acupuncture group (AG) (n = 33) and electroacupuncture group (EG) (n = 33). Interventions will last one hour, and will happen twice a week for 6 weeks. The primary clinical outcomes will be pain intensity as measured and functional disability. Secondary outcomes: quality of pain, quality of life. perception of the overall effect, depressive state, flexibility and kinesiophobia. All the outcomes will be assessed will be assessed at baseline, at treatment end, and three months after treatment end. Significance level will be determined at the 5 % level. Results of this trial will help clarify the value of acupuncture and electroacupuncture as a treatment for chronic low back pain and if they are different. Discussion Results of this trial will help clarify the value of acupuncture needling and electroacupuncture stimulation of specific points on the body as a treatment for chronic low back pain. Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02039037 . Register October 30, 2013.
dc.languageen
dc.publisherBioMed Central
dc.relationTrials
dc.rightsComachio et al.
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.subjectElectroacupunture
dc.subjectacupuncture
dc.subjectlow back pain
dc.subjectphysiotherapy
dc.titleEfficacy of acupuncture and electroacupuncture in patients with nonspecific low back pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución