dc.creatorHesse, Daniela
dc.creatorBonifácio, Clarissa C
dc.creatorMendes, Fausto M
dc.creatorBraga, Mariana M
dc.creatorImparato, José C P
dc.creatorRaggio, Daniela P
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-09T16:38:32Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-04T16:58:20Z
dc.date.available2015-01-09T16:38:32Z
dc.date.available2018-07-04T16:58:20Z
dc.date.created2015-01-09T16:38:32Z
dc.date.issued2014-05-28
dc.identifierBMC Oral Health. 2014 May 28;14(1):58
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-14-58
dc.identifierhttp://www.producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/47229
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1642894
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background The resin-based pit and fissure sealant is considered a successful tool in caries prevention, however there is a growing evidence of its use in controlling already established caries in posterior teeth. The aim of this clinical trial is to verify the efficacy of pit and fissure sealants in arresting dentinal caries lesions compared to partial excavation and restorative treatment in primary molar teeth. Methods Thirty six patients with occlusal cavitated primary molar reaching outer half of dentin were selected. The patients were randomly allocated into two groups: sealant application (experimental group – n = 17) and restoration with composite resin (control group – n = 19). Clinical and radiograph evaluation were performed after 6, 12 and 18 months. The chi-square test was used to verify the distribution of characteristics variables of the sample among the groups. The survival rate of treatments was evaluated using Kaplan–Meier survival and log-rank test. Fisher’s Exact and logistic regression tests were calculated in each evaluation period (α = 5%). Results The control group showed significantly better clinical survival after 18 months (p = 0.0025). In both groups, no caries progression was registered on the radiographic evaluations. Conclusions Sealing had similar efficacy in the arrestment of caries progression of cavitated occlusal lesions compared to partial excavation of the lesions, even though the frequency of re-treatments was significantly higher in sealed lesions. Trial registration Registro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clínicos (ReBEC): RBR-9kkv53
dc.languageen
dc.rightsHesse et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.titleSealing versus partial caries removal in primary molars: a randomized clinical trial
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución