dc.creatorCarvalho, Rodrigo Antonio Ponce de Leon Ferreira de
dc.creatorLemos, Daniel Eduardo Lavanholi de
dc.creatorTacon, Albert G.J.
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-16T14:13:43Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-04T16:49:21Z
dc.date.available2014-07-16T14:13:43Z
dc.date.available2018-07-04T16:49:21Z
dc.date.created2014-07-16T14:13:43Z
dc.date.issued2013-11
dc.identifierAquacultural Engineering, London, v.57,p.9–17, 2013
dc.identifier0144-8609
dc.identifierhttp://www.producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/45767
dc.identifier10.1016/j.aquaeng.2013.05.004
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2013.05.004
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1640836
dc.description.abstractIn vivo digestibility determination in shrimp is a challenge because these animals are coprophagous, benthic and slow feeders and the small amount of feces that they produce is difficult to collect. The objective of this study was to evaluate an efficient tank design for the purpose of studying shrimp digestibility. Different tank designs were evaluated considering drain system (dual-drain and single-drain), water inlet flow rate (8, 12, and 16 L min−1) and bottom drain diameter (6, 13, 19, 25 and 50 mm) and their effects on tank hydraulics, water velocity and solids flushing. A circular and slightly conical 500 L tank was adapted with a clarifier for the two dual-drain designs (Cornell-type and central-type) and settling columns for the two single-drain designs (Guelph-F and Guelph-L). Results showed that: (1) water rotational velocity profile was more homogeneous in tanks with larger bottom drain outlets, and water velocity increased with water inlet flow rate from almost zero up to 14.5 ± 0.7 cm s−1; (2) solids flushing, measured as the percentage of feed pellets retained at both the bottom drain and in the settling devices, was positively correlated with the surface loading rate (L min−1 flow per m2) and was more effective at the Guelph-L design fitted with a 150 mm diameter settling column. In this system 100% of the solids were removed at the inflow rate of 16 L min−1. It can be concluded that among the systems evaluated, the Guelph-L at an inflow-rate of 12 L min−1 was most efficient for both solids removal and water velocity profile and thus seemed more suitable for shrimp digestibility studies in high performance conditions. Technologies involving hydrodynamic must be intensively applied to solids removal for aquatic species production as well as research purposes like digestibility, which is highlighted in this study.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherLondon
dc.relationAquacultural Engineering
dc.rightsCopyright Elsevier
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.subjectDual-drain
dc.subjectShrimp
dc.subjectDigestibility
dc.subjectTank design
dc.subjectWater velocity
dc.subjectSolids removal
dc.titlePerformance of single-drain and dual-drain tanks in terms of water velocity profile and solids flushing for in vivo digestibility studies in juvenile shrimp
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución