Artículos de revistas
What drives the seasonality of photosynthesis across the Amazon basin? A cross-site analysis of eddy flux tower measurements from the Brasil flux network
Fecha
2014-03-25Registro en:
10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.04.031
Autor
Restrepo-Coupe, Natalia
Rocha, Humberto Ribeiro da
Hutyra, Lucy R.
Araujo, Alessandro C. da
Borma, Laura de Simone
Christoffersen, Bradley
Cardoso, Fernando L.
Costa, Antonio C. Lola da
Fitzjarrald, David R.
Goulden, Michael L.
Kruijt, Bart
Maia, Jair M.F.
Malhi, Yadvinder S.
Manzi, Antonio O.
Miller, Scott D.
Nobre, Antonio D.
Randow, Celso von
Sá, Leonardo D. Abreu
Sakai, Ricardo K.
Tota, Julio
Wofsy, Steven C.
Zanchi, Fabricio B.
Saleska, Scott R.
Cabral, Osvaldo M. R.
Camargo, Plínio B. de
Institución
Resumen
We investigated the seasonal patterns of Amazonian forest photosynthetic activity, and the effects
thereon of variations in climate and land-use, by integrating data from a network of ground-based eddy
flux towers in Brazil established as part of the ‘Large-Scale Biosphere Atmosphere Experiment in Amazonia’
project. We found that degree of water limitation, as indicated by the seasonality of the ratio
of sensible to latent heat flux (Bowen ratio) predicts seasonal patterns of photosynthesis. In equatorial
Amazonian forests (5◦ N–5◦ S), water limitation is absent, and photosynthetic fluxes (or gross ecosystem
productivity, GEP) exhibit high or increasing levels of photosynthetic activity as the dry season
progresses, likely a consequence of allocation to growth of new leaves. In contrast, forests along the
southern flank of the Amazon, pastures converted from forest, and mixed forest-grass savanna, exhibit
dry-season declines in GEP, consistent with increasing degrees of water limitation. Although previous
work showed tropical ecosystem evapotranspiration (ET) is driven by incoming radiation, GEP observations
reported here surprisingly show no or negative relationships with photosynthetically active
radiation (PAR). Instead, GEP fluxes largely followed the phenology of canopy photosynthetic capacity (Pc),
with only deviations from this primary pattern driven by variations in PAR. Estimates of leaf flush at three