dc.creatorBueno, José Lino de Oliveira
dc.creatorJudice-Daher, Danielle Marcilio
dc.creatorTavares, Tatiane Ferreira
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-04T13:08:14Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-04T16:39:55Z
dc.date.available2013-11-04T13:08:14Z
dc.date.available2018-07-04T16:39:55Z
dc.date.created2013-11-04T13:08:14Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifierPsychol. Neurosci.,v.5,n.2,p.265-273,2012
dc.identifier1983-3288
dc.identifierhttp://www.producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/40628
dc.identifier10.3922/j.psns.2012.2.18
dc.identifierhttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-32882012000200018&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en
dc.identifierhttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1983-32882012000200018&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en
dc.identifierhttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&pid=S1983-32882012000200018&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1638684
dc.description.abstractThe reinforcement omission effect (ROE) has been attributed to both motivational and attentional consequences of surprising reinforcement omission. Recent evidence suggests that the basolateral complex of the amygdala is involved in motivational components related to reinforcement value, whereas the central nucleus of the amygdala is involved in the processing of the attentional consequences of surprise. This study was designed to verify whether the mechanisms involved in the ROE depend on the integrity of either the basolateral amygdala complex or central nucleus of the amygdala. The ROE was evaluated in rats with lesions of either the central nucleus or basolateral complex of the amygdala and trained on a fixed-interval schedule procedure (Experiment 1) and fixed-interval with limited hold signaled schedule procedure (Experiment 2). The results of Experiment 1 showed that sham-operated rats and rats with lesions of either the central nucleus or basolateral area displayed the ROE. In contrast, in Experiment 2, subjects with lesions of the central nucleus or basolateral complex of the amygdala exhibited a smaller ROE compared with sham-operated subjects. Thus, the effects of selective lesions of amygdala subregions on the ROE in rats depended on the training procedure. Furthermore, the absence of differences between the lesioned groups in either experiment did not allow the dissociation of attentional or motivational components of the ROE with functions of specific areas of the amygdala. Thus, results did not show a functional double-dissociation between the central nucleus and basolateral area in the ROE.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherPontificia Universidade Católica do Rio de JaneiroUniversidade de BrasíliaUniversidade de São Paulo
dc.relationPsychology & Neuroscience
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.subjectreinforcement omission effect
dc.subjectbasolateral amygdala
dc.subjectcentral nucleus of the amygdala
dc.subjectoperant conditioning
dc.subjectrat
dc.titleRole of the amygdala in the reinforcement omission effect
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución