dc.creatorFiamengui Filho, Jorge Francisco
dc.creatorAlmeida, Ana Lúcia Pompéia Fraga de
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-17T13:29:49Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-04T16:29:44Z
dc.date.available2013-10-17T13:29:49Z
dc.date.available2018-07-04T16:29:44Z
dc.date.created2013-10-17T13:29:49Z
dc.date.issued2013-09
dc.identifierCleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, Lewiston, v.50, n.5, p.597-602, Sept. 2013
dc.identifierhttp://www.producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/35167
dc.identifier10.1597/11-193
dc.identifierhttp://www.cpcjournal.org/doi/pdf/10.1597/11-193
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1636363
dc.description.abstractObjective: To evaluate the aesthetics of an implant-supported denture at the cleft area, comparing the peri-implant tissues and prosthetic crown with the contralateral tooth. Settings: Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies, Bauru, São Paolo, Brazil. Patients: A total of 39 individuals of both genders, with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate, who received secondary alveolar bone graft and were rehabilitated with single implant-supported dentures at the area of the missing maxillary lateral incisor after completion of orthodontic treatment. Interventions: The following parameters were analyzed in follow-up sessions: length and width of prosthetic crown and contralateral tooth, characteristics of implants, filling of interproximal space by the papilla, and smile height of the patients. Results: The implant-supported prosthetic crowns were longer than the contralateral tooth (p < .001). Among the 78 papillae analyzed, 29 (37.17%) received a score of 3; 32 (41.02%) papillae had a score of 2; and 17 (21.79%) received a score of 1. Concerning the smile height, among the 39 patients analyzed, 23 (56.41%) had a medium smile, 15 (38.46%) had a high smile, and two (5.12%) presented a low smile. Conclusion: The use of dental implants to rehabilitate the edentulous cleft area is an excellent option. However, adequate evaluation of the bone quantity and quality, positioning and shape of adjacent teeth, smile height, and patient expectations should be considered to achieve success and avoid aesthetic deformities such as elongated teeth and absence of gingival papillae.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherAllen Press
dc.publisherLewiston
dc.relationCleft Palate Craniofacial Journal
dc.rightsCopyright The American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.subjectaesthetics
dc.subjectcleft lip and palate
dc.subjectdental implants
dc.titleAesthetic analysis of an implant-supported denture at the cleft area
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución