Comparison between frequency domain and time domain riser analysis

dc.creatorTakafuji, Fernanda Cristina de Moraes
dc.creatorMartins, Clovis de Arruda
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-21T11:59:26Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-04T16:26:19Z
dc.date.available2013-10-21T11:59:26Z
dc.date.available2018-07-04T16:26:19Z
dc.date.created2013-10-21T11:59:26Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifierJournal of Offshore Mechanics and Artic Engineering-Transactions of the ASME, New York, v. 134, n. 4, supl. 1, Part 3, p. 123-126, Nov, 2012
dc.identifier0892-7219
dc.identifierhttp://www.producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/35312
dc.identifier10.1115/1.4006149
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.4006149
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1635842
dc.description.abstractIn the optimization or parametric analyses of risers, several configurations must be analyzed. It is laborious to perform time domain solutions for the dynamic analysis, since they are time-consuming tasks. So, frequency domain solutions appear to be a possible alternative, mainly in the early stages of a riser design. However, frequency domain analysis is linear and requires that nonlinear effects are treated. The aim of this paper is to present a possible way to treat some of these nonlinearities, using an iterative process together with an analytical correction, and compare the results of a frequency domain analysis with the those of a full nonlinear analysis. [DOI: 10.1115/1.4006149]
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherASME
dc.publisherNEW YORK
dc.relationJournal of Offshore Mechanics and Artic Engineering- Transactions of The ASME
dc.rightsCopyright ASME
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.titleComparison between frequency domain and time domain riser analysis
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución